Enhancing Poetic Literature Instruction Through Stylistic and Thematic Approaches
Findings revealed that there was significant main effect of treatment on students’ achievement in poetry (F (2,125) =25.915; P<.05). There was no significant main effect of gender on students’ achievement in poetry (F(1,125)= .011; P>.05. The interaction effect of treatment and gender on students’ achievement in poetry was, however, not significant (F(2,125=.577; P>.05). Based on these findings, it is recommended that teachers should adopt stylistic and thematic approaches in the teaching of poetry in particular and literature in general.
Aluko, O. O. (1989). Effects of three methods of poetry teaching on attitude and achievement of secondary school students (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Anderson, S. A. (2000). Parental Involvement makes a difference in Reading Achievement. Alabama, USA: Reading Improvement Publisher.
Aremu, A. (1988). Behavioral Preparedness of Students That Are Willing to Take Important Examinations. A study of University of Ibadan Students. Unpublished B.Ed. Project, Department of Guidance and Counseling, University of Ibadan.Nigeria.
Ayanniyi, M. A. (2009). The Effect of Advance Organizer on Students’ Achievement and Their Attitude to Poetic Literature in Ibadan Metropolis (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Basu, J. ,& Chakroborty, U. (1996). Effect of sex role identity on academic achievement of late adolescents in India. Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2) 257-259. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714001
Blume, Z. (2009). Middle childhood development: a contextual approach. California: Pearson Allyn Bacon and Prentice Hall Publishers.
Brosnan, M. (1998). The implications for academic attainment of perceived gender- appropriateness upon spatial task performance. British Journal of Education Psychology, 68, 203-215. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01284.x
Fischer-Starke, R. (2010). Literature programmes in Malaysian schools: A historical overview in Ganakumaran, S and Edwin, M. (eds). Teaching of literature in ESL/EFL context (pp.27-30). Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Sdn Bhd.
Grotuck, M. (1987). Languages in literature in teaching literature overseas: language-based approaches. Elmsford (Ed) New York: Pergamon Press.
Henderson, L. (1994). Parents education and involvement in relation to the schools. London: The Macmillan Press.
Hwang, D. ,& Embi, M. (2007). Approaches employed by secondary schools teachers to teaching the literature component in English. Bangi: Universiti Kebagsaan Madaysaan.
Iwuchukwu, C. (2003). The mastery of literature (pp. 7-25). Lagos: Macckho- Ricckho Press and Publishing Company Ltd.
Jacobs, J. (2002). The use of multi- level modeling study individual change and context effect in achievement motivation. In P.R. Pintrich and M.L. Maehir (eds). New Direction in Measure and Methods. New York: Elsevier science.
Johnson, J. ,& Duffet, A. (2003). Where we are now: things you need to know about public opinion and public schools. New York: Public Agenda.
Kovalik, S. (2005). Focus on effectiveness of research-based strategies. Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Makinde, S. (2004). The relative effect of oral and written literature models as environment Inputs on students’ achievement in and attitude in Yoruba composition writing (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
Matting, F.,& Zulfigar, A. (2002). Sylistic and discourse analysis: a contribution in analyzing literature. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
Niazir, N. (2010). How to study literature: stylistic and pragmatic approaches. New Delhi: Sarup and Sons.
Oyesoji, A. (1999). Effect of gender and parenting style on academic performance of undergraduates students of a Nigeria university. African Journal of Education Research, 5 (1), 169-174.
Parwathy,R., Richards, C., Bhajan, K.and Thevy, R. (2004). Light on literature emeralds: selected poems and short stories for form 4. Petaling Jaya : Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistic: a resource book for students. London: Routledge.
Smith, S. (2010). The reasons why a student should study English literature. Hong Kong: ITS Educational News.
Tella, A. ,& Tella, A. (2003). Relationship among emotional intelligence, parental involvement and acadmic achievement of secondary school students in Ibadan, Nigeria. Research in Education (Vol. 12, pp. 45-17).
Timucin, M. (2010). Exploring the language of poems: a stylistic study. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language). Kuala Lumpur: Sasbadi- Melta ELT Press, 4(2) 129-140.
Tutas, N. (2006). Theory into Practice: Teaching and Responding to Literature Aesthetically. In Paran (ed) Literature in Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 140-156). Virginia: TESOL.
Ufot, S. (2006). Introduction to Stylistic and Discourse Analysis. Ado Ekiti: Greenline Publisher.
Weber, F. (1996). The Abstraction of Linguistic Ideas. Cognitive Psychology. 2(1) 331-335.
West African Examinations Council. (2011). Chief Examiners’ Report . Ikeja: Test Development Division.
Yushan, F. (2008). Approach as an alternative teaching and learning device for coherent writing. www.hss.nthu.edu.tw/../945258
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org