A Social Constructive Study on Optimizing College English Teaching Strategies
College English teaching plays a significant role in college education, which pays a way for the university students to be more competitive in multinational talent market. Therefore, appropriate and effective college English Teaching strategy applied in the process of college English teaching is considered greatly important. Constructivism which originated and evolved from dissatisfaction of Behaviorist and Cognitivist view of learning and knowledge, posits that learning is a constructive process in which learners build an internal knowledge and a personal interpretation of experience, therefore, knowledge is constructed by individuals or groups as opposed to passively received from the world or authoritative sources. Considering learning process under the perspective of constructivism, college English teachers should adopt some corresponding methods under the guidance of the theory of social constructivism to optimize their teaching strategy. The flexible teaching model, modularized teaching content, perfect teaching assessment system and specialized professional team are advocated to make college English teaching conducted in an effective and positive way.
Duffy, T., & Cunningham, D. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp.170-198). New York: Simon and Schuster.
Duffy, T., & Jonassen, D. (1991). Continuing the dialogue. Educational Technology, 31(4), 9-11.
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fostnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp.8-33). New York: Teachers Colledge Press.
Gredler, M. E. (2005). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice. Upper Saddle Rivers, NJ: Peason Merrill Prentice Hall.
Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environment. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp.215-240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17-27.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Marcum-Dietrich, N. I. (2007). Using constructivist theories to educate “outsiders”. Journal of Latinos and Education, 7(1), 79-87.
Perkins, D. N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner? Educational Technology, 31(9), 19-21.
Yilmaz, K. (2008). Constructivism: Its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and implications for classroom instruction. Educational Horizons, Spring.
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org