An Analysis of Chinese English Learners’ Scores in CET Band 4 and 6 and Its Implications
Abstract
This paper conducts a statistical analysis of CET band 4 and 6 scores of 14,265 students from Shanxi Normal University and reveals the following findings: firstly, the analysis of percentage of listening, reading, cloze and writing relative to the total scores shows that students’ writing score accounts for 19.2%, close to the standard rate of 20%; their cloze score is 10.7%, slightly higher than the standard rate of 10%. However, their reading scores take up to 38.8% of their total scores, much higher than the standard rate of 35%; listening score accounts for 31.0%, much lower than the standard rate of 35%. These figures show that students’ ability in writing and cloze is, by and large, consistent with the requirement. As for reading and listening, the former is better than required, but the latter still leaves much room for further improvement. Secondly, comparative analysis of the two CET4 scores indicates that the potential area for score increase is the section of listening and reading. Thirdly, an analysis of band 4 and 6 scores reveal the relationship between students’ passing rate in band 6 and their previous band 4 scores. The research findings can offer some guide for college English teaching and learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cai, J. G. (2011). Discipline-based English teaching within the framework of CBI. Foreign Language Education, 32(5), 35-38.
Council of College English Test Band 4 and Band 6. (2012, July 26). College English Test score explanation. Retrieved from http:///www.cet.edu.cn/cet 2011.htm
Gu, X. D. (2007). Features of college English teaching—Effect of CET band 4 and band 6 on classroom teaching. Journal of Xi’an Foreign Studies University, 15(4), 39-45.
Li, Y. P., & Shao, Y. Z. (2003). Practice of standard statistical analysis in college English teaching testing. Foreign Language Education, 24(1), 53-56.
Rivers, W. M. (Ed.). (1983). Speaking in many tongues: Essays in foreign language teaching (3rd ed.). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Rivers, W. M. (2016). Principles of interactive language teaching. http://edevaluator.org/rivers/10Principles_0.html
Yang, H. Z. (2001). Interpretation of CET band 4 and band 6 scores. World of Foreign Languages, (1), 62-68.
Zhang, Y. X. (2008). General guidelines for CET band 4 and band 6 reform. Chinese Higher Education, (18), 26-27.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8945
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Yuling JI, Jun-ying Kang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture