The Role of Syntax and Semantics in the Grammars of English Learners

Guy Matthews

Abstract


The extent to which syntactic models, semantic models or combined models incorporating both syntactic and semantic elements explain the language used by learners has been much researched. This study assumes that there is an innate language faculty which plays a fundamental part in a native speaker’s acquisition of their first language. In particular it will focus on the use of reflexives, a highly abstruse area which is not part of formal English teaching. However, posited syntactic models of how reflexives are used and interpreted do not seem to fully explain native speaker intuitions. This discontinuity between the syntactic models and the results from data obtained from informants has also become apparent in the research into Second Language Acquisition (SLA). Thus, this research will look at a model which combines the syntactic theory of movement at Logical Form with the semantic theory that pronouns and reflexives can be described in terms of logophoricity. Testing will then be undertaken of native speakers of English as well as native speakers of Mandarin Chinese to see if this model can account for their intuitions about English reflexive pronoun


Keywords


Syntax; Semantics; Logophoricity; Logical form; Head movement; Language acquisition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Battistella, E. (1989). Chinese reflexivization: A movement to INFL approach. Linguistics, 27, 987-1012.

Chomsky, N. (1976). Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 303-351.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Foris.

Chou, C.-T. (2012), Syntax-pragmatics interface: Mandarin Chinese wh-the-hell and point-of-view operator. Syntax, 15, 1-24.

Cole, P., Hermon, G., & Sung, L.-M. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 1-21.

Cole, P., & Sung, L.-M. (1994). Head movement and long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 355-406.

Cole, P., & Wang, C.-C. (1996). Antecedent and blockers of long distance reflexives: The case of Chinese ziji. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 357-90.

Cole, P., Hermon, G., & Lee, C.-L. (2001). Grammatical and discourse conditions on long distance reflexives in two Chinese dialects. In P. Cole, G. Hermon, & C.-T. Huang (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Long-distance reflexives (Vol. 33, pp.1-46). San Diego: Academic Press.

Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1998). The strong continuity hypothesis: some evidence concerning functional categories in adult L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp.61-77). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Flynn, S., Martohardjono, D., & O’Neil, W. (Eds.). (1998). The generative study of second language acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Huang, C.-T., & Liu C.-S. (2001) Logophoricity, attitudes and ziji at the interface. In P. Cole, G. Hermon, & C.-T. Huang (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Long-distance reflexives (Vol.33). San Diego: Academic Press.

Liu, L. (2012), Logophoricity, highlighting and contrasting: A pragmatic study of third-person reflexives in Chinese discourse. English Language and Literature Studies, 2, 69-84.

Reuland, E. (2001). Anaphors, logophors, and binding. In P. Cole, G. Hermon & C.-T. Huang (Eds.). Syntax and semantics: Long-distance reflexives (Vol.33). San Diego: Academic Press.

Sells, P. (1987). Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 445-79.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8846

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Guy Matthews

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


 

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailoffice@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture