Language Learning and Language Acquisition: What Do the Learners Prefer ?

G. SANKAR, R. SOUNDARARAJAN, S. P. SURESH KUMAR

Abstract


The aim of this study is to evaluate learning and acquisition strategies used by second language learners of Engineering College Students in Tamilnadu State. This study is a comparative investigation of learning and acquisition strategies of successful and less successful language learners. Why some learners become less successful in language learning while others become more successful is a common question in this area. Although there are many different reasons, one of them is related with “strategies” of the learners. The study presents an analysis of a research to capture second language learners’ learning strategies in terms of acquisition and learning. Two hundred and twenty undergraduate higher education students were participated in the study. They were grouped in two parts as “successful learners” and “less successful earners” learners. The learners’ levels were based on their scores on a standardized test administered at the beginning of their college. These findings have important implications for College Professors, School Teachers, instructors and program designers to develop and practice different language strategies in order to have more successful students. At the end of the study, some suggestions were submitted to foreign language learners and secondary language learners also.


Keywords


Strategy; Acquisition; Learning; Language; Engineering; Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alptekin, C. (2007). Egitimde kuram ve uygulama. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, Articles, 3(1), 4.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An ınteractive approach to langıage pedagogy. Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson, Longman.

Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In J. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp.155-207). New York: Wiley.

Brown, R., Cazden, C., & Bellugi, U. (1973). The child’s grammar from I to III. In C. Ferguson and D. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp.295-333). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Ehrman, M. E. (2001). Bringing learning strategies to the learner: The FSI language learning consultation service. In Alatis, J. E., & Tan, A. (Eds.), Language in our time: Bilingual education and official English, ebonics and standard English, ımmigration and the Unz ınitiative (pp.41-58). Georgetown University. Washington DC.

Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79 (1), 67-89.

Ehrman, M., Leaver, B., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313-330

Ellis, R. (2012). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Krashen, S., & Seliger, H. (1975). The essential contributions of formal instruction in adult second language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 173-183.

Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1995). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Phoenix ELT, Prentice Hall, Macmillan.

Macaro, E. (2004). Fourteen features of a language learner strategy. Working Paper #4. Oxford: Department of Educational Studies, University of Oxford.rning. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 173-183.

O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.

Oxford, R. L. (1995). Style Analysis Survey. In J. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp.208-215). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson InternationaReiff, J., 1992. Learning Styles. (What Research Says to the Teacher.). National Education Assn, Washington, DC.

Richards, J. C., & Renandy, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching, Cambridge University Press.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterlly, 9, 41-51.

Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.15-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Wenden, A., & Rubin, J., et al. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Cambridge: Prentice Hall International.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8706

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 G. SANKAR, R. SOUNDARARAJAN, S. P. SURESH KUMAR

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


 

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailoffice@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture