A Comparative Analysis of Violence in A Rose for Emily and in Lord of the Flies

Xiaoyu HE, Lingying TANG

Abstract


A Rose for Emily and Lord of the Flies, as the respective masterpiece of Faulkner’s and Golding’s, have long been studied by scholars in different times, but seldom discussed and compared violence in them before. In order to make an all-around exploration of violence in literary works, this paper conducts a comparative study on violence in these two novels from five perspectives: social background, manifesting form of violence, criminal behaviors, violence types and pursuits of protagonists. These two novels share similarities and differences on violence. As for similarities, both novels are under depressive social background, with similar manifesting forms of violence. In addition, both protagonists kill others to fulfill their own desires. As for differences, A Rose for Emily tells about women violence, while Lord of the Flies talks about men violence. Besides, in the former novel, Emily is in the pursuit of love and self-awakening, while in the latter novel Jack pursues power. Through comparison, this paper reveals that violence is rooted from desire for unattainable love or goals and the evil side of human nature. Therefore, it is necessary for readers to pay attention to cultural, social, political and psychological factors behind violence aesthetics in literature and then reduce realistic violence.

Keywords


Violence aesthetics; Comparative analysis; Similarities; Differences; Root of violence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Crawford, P. (2002). Politics and history in William Golding. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

Faulkner, W. (2003). A rose for Emily. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.

Golding, W. (2006). Lord of the flies. New York: The Penguin Group.

Hogle, J. E. (2002). Gothic fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Li, S. R. (2001). Abnormal psychology existing between freedom of life and off balance of mental perception. Journal of Inner Mongolian University, 30(6), 76-80.

Millgate, M. (1987). The achievement of William Faulkner. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

Olsen, K. (2000). Understanding lord of the flies: A case book to issues, sources, and historical documents. Westport Connecticut: Green wood Press.

Seldon & Widdowson. (2004). A reader’s guide to contemporary literature theory. Beijing: Foreign Teaching and Research Press.

Sneard, J. A. (1986). Figures of division: William Faulkner’s Major Works. New York :Methuen.

Zhou, C. S. (1999). Tragic spirit and history of European intellect and culture. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8188

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Studies in Literature and Language



Share us to:   

 

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net，or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture