A Study of Optimizing Non-English Majors’ English Writing Teaching Approach Through Micro-Writing
Abstract
As an important output activity, English writing is a full show of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners’ English proficiency, for it is associated with vocabulary, grammar, sentences, culture and English thinking pattern. However, as for non-English majors, English writing is the part that they easily fail to gain marks, though they have been learning English for years. Four traditional writing teaching approaches which are product approach, process approach, genre approach and task-based approach don’t help students too much and students still hold negative attitudes towards their writing and have no passion for writing. Such writing problems as oversimplified vocabulary and sentences, unrelated contents, incoherent and illogical discourse and negative transfer of the mother tongue are easy to be found in students’ compositions. The more their writing problems are found, the more painful they feel when they write. As for teachers, although they spend a large amount of time teaching words and sentences and employing kinds of approaches in their teaching, the results are still rather disappointing. Therefore, this study analyzes four traditional English writing teaching approaches and proposes that micro-writing can be used to facilitate and optimize English writing learning and teaching. Different from traditional writing teaching approaches, micro-writing asks for concise and comprehensive writing. In addition, micro-writing is applicable for non- English majors’ psychological features and advocates the integration of reading and writing. Therefore, micro-writing can inspire Chinese English majors’ desire for English writing, thereby improving their writing proficiency.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cope, B., & Kalantzis. (1993). The power of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. London: Falmer Press.
Du, H. M. (2015). Micro-writing in mother tongue education in the United States. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, (05).
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London, New York: Longman.
Ma, H. L. (Ed.) (2004). American literature. Beijing: Tongxin Press.
Nunan. D. (2001). Second language teaching and learning. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Language and Research Press.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. London: Cambridge University Press.
Richard, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2000). Approaches and methods in language teaching. London: Cambridge University Press.
Picas, A. (1982). Teaching English writing. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Qing, X. B. (2000). Review of genre teaching approach. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research (Bimonthly), (01).
Wu, Q. L. (Ed.) (2011). Reading course 2, new college English (2nd ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/7846
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Studies in Literature and Language
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture