Metaphorical Thinking and Comparison Cognition
Abstract
Metaphor in language is the manifestation of metaphorical thinking. Although metaphor has been studied from different perspectives with different focuses, systematic researches on metaphor have seldom been conducted from the angle of metaphorical thinking. Approaching from the perspective of thinking, this paper aims to elaborate the cognitive mechanism of metaphor and claims that comparison cognition generates metaphorical thinking which is a dynamic process consisting of some cognitive links that constitute an organic whole.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burstein, M. H. (1986). Concept formation by incremental analogical reasoning and debugging. In R. S. Michalski, J. G.. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Vol.2). Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.
Collins, A., & Burstein, M. (1989). Afterword: A framework for a theory of comparison and mapping. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Collins, A., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82.
Collins, A. (1978). Fragments of a theory of Human plausible reasoning. In D. L. Waltz (Ed.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois, Coordinated Science Laboratory.
Collins, A., & Michalski, R. (1989). The logic of plausible reasoning: A core theory. Cognitive Science, 13.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gardenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual spaces as a framework for knowledge representation. Mind and Matter, 2(2), 9-27.
Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. The MIT Press.
Gardenfors, P. (2011). Semantics based on conceptual spaces. In M. Banerjee & A. Seth (Eds.). ICLA 2011, LNAI 6521.
Gardenfors, P. (2014). The geometry of meaning—Semantics based on conceptual spaces. The MIT Press.
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and Metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. & Gerard J. Steen (Ed.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kittay, E. (1990). Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lakoff, G. (2009). The political mind. New York: Penguin Books.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphor we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. I): Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Morgan, J. L. (1979). Observations on the pragmatics of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press.
Quintilian. (1920). Institutio oratora. Trans. In H. E. Butler (Ed.). London: Loeb Classical Library.
Richard, I. A. (1936).The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture