Exploring Language Teachers’ Evolving Conceptualizations of Language Variation
Abstract
This paper examines conceptions that pre-service teachers of English bring to the term language variation, a crucial constellation of concepts in linguistics related to understanding the socioculturally variant nature of language. We review responses given to open-ended questions about language variation, focusing on statements made regarding this term at different points of professional development, looking particularly at how initial understanding of language variation evolves as a result of having multiple exposures to this linguistic concept across differing language courses. Survey questions related both to a definition language variation and to an assessment of the importance of this concept for the careers for which these respondents were preparing. Comparative content analyses of responses reveals that many pre-service teachers start their academic careers with differing preconceptions of language variation based on general use of the term. Though these pre-service teachers are sometimes reflective about aspects of variation, their early formulations are quite narrow in scope, often reflecting an incomplete or less sophisticated understanding of the term. Results suggest that, as these pre-service teachers extend their coursework, they also expand and refine their initial understanding of language variation, thereby gaining a discipline-specific and nuanced understanding of the term. Results also show broad appreciation for language variation, and development in the ability to articulate how awareness of variation might assist their teaching.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adger, C., Snow, C., & Christian, D. (Eds.). (2002). What teachers need to know about language. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Adger, C., Wolfram, W., & Christian, D. (2007). Dialects in schools and communities (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Ann, J., & Peng, L. (2005). The relevance of linguistic analysis to the role of teachers as decision makers. In K. Denham & A. Lobeck (Eds.), Language in the schools: Integrating linguistic knowledge into K-12 teaching (pp.71-86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Arndt, V., Harvey, P., & Nuttal, J. (2000). Alive to language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Attardo, S., & Brown, S. (2005). What’s the use of linguistics? Pre-service English teachers’ beliefs towards language use and variation. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp.91-102). New York: Springer.
Bartels, N. (2005). Applied linguistics and language teacher education: What we know. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp.387-404). New York: Springer.
Bartels, N. (Ed.) (2005). Applied linguistics and language teacher education. New York: Springer.
Byrnes, H. (2000). Shaping the discourse of a practice: The role of linguistics and psychology in language teaching and learning. The Modern Language Journal, 84(4), 472-94.
Coelho, E. (1991). Caribbean students in Canadian schools, Book 2. Markham, Ontario: Pippin Publishing.
Curzan, A. (2002). Teaching the politics of standard English. Journal of English Linguistics, 30(4), 339-52.
Curzan, A. (2013). Linguistics matters: Resistance and relevance in teacher education. Language, 89(1), e1-e10.
Davis, J. (2001). Conceptual change. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
De Bot, K., Lowie,W., & Verspoor, M. (2007, March) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(01), 7-21.
Denham, K. & Lobeck, A. (Eds.) (2010). Linguistics at school: Language awareness in primary and secondary education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denham, K., & Lobeck, A. (Eds.) (2005). Language in the schools: Integrating linguistic knowledge in K-12 teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
‘Do You Speak American?’ PBS Documentary. (2005). In MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/speak/education/
Edwards, C., & Owen, C. (2005). The impact on teachers of language variation as a course component. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp.43-58). New York: Springer.
Farkas, G. (1996). Human capital or cultural capital: Ethnicity and poverty groups in an urban school district. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Farrell, T. (2009). Critical reflections in a TESL course: Mapping conceptual change. ELT Journal, 63(3), 221-229.
Garshick, E. (Ed.). (2002). Directory of teacher education programs in TESOL in the United States and Canada, 2002-2004. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.
Grabe, W., Stroller, F. L., & Tardy, C. (2000). Disciplinary knowledge as a foundation for teacher preparation. In J. K. Hall, J. K., & W. G. Eggington (Eds.), The sociopolitics of English language teaching (pp.178-194). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Haig, Y., & Oliver, R. (2003). Language variation and education: Teachers’ perceptions. Language and Education, 17(4), 266-280.
Hudley, A. C., & Mallinson, C. (2009). Communicating about communication: multidisciplinary approaches to educating educators about language variation. Compass Interdisciplinary Virtual Conference, Rertieved from http://compassconference.wordpress.com
Hudley, A. C., & Mallinson, C. (2011). Understanding English language variation in U.S. schools. Teachers College Press Multicultural Education Series.
LaFond, L., & Dogancay-Aktuna, S. (2009). Teacher perspectives on linguistics in TESOL teacher education. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 345-365.
Nussbaum, J., & Novick, N. (1982) Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict, and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183-200.
Richards, J. (1998). Beyond training. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., Gallo, P., & Renandya, W. (2001). Exploring teachers’ beliefs and the processes of change. The PAC Journal, 1(1), 41-62.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
VanDijk, M. (2003). Child language cuts capers: Variability and ambiguity in early child development. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Groningen.
Wheeler, R. (2005). Code-switching to teach standard English. English Journal, 94(5), 108-112.
Wheeler, R., & Swords, R. (2006). Code-switching: Teaching standard English in urban classrooms. Urbana, IL: NCTE Press.
Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50, 47-54.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture