Research on College English Writing Based on Peerceptiv Peer Review System
Abstract
This research conducted a writing experiment based on the Peerceptiv peer review system, collecting the first and second drafts of 47 non-English majors based on one topic, as well as the peer review comments and grades, the reliability of students’ evaluations, and average grades on each dimension from the Peerceptiv platform. Through a comparative analysis of the mean grades of students’ first and second drafts in various dimensions, it was noticed that students’ writing skills showed a slow upward trend through the multi-peer reviewing mode. Students’ second draft showed better quality than the first one. However, the overall rating reliability of the grades in various dimensions of the two drafts was low. Compared with the first draft, the credibility of the second draft’s peer review improved significantly in several dimensions. The reason lies in the students’ limited English proficiency and their negative attitudes resulting from relying solely on peer evaluation and grading mechanisms. Therefore, the combination of “teacher’s personalized guidance + online peer review + teacher evaluation” can maximize the advantages of the Peerceptiv platform and help writing teaching.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bai, L. R. (2021). Research on the Inducing Factors and Manifestation Characteristics of English Writing Anxiety Among College Learners. Foreign language and Literature, 37(5),129-138.
Gao, Y., Zhang, F. H., Zhang, S. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Research on the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in English Writing Based on the Peerceptive Peer Review System. Technology Enhanced Foreign Languages, 180(4), 3-9.
He, J. J. (2019). Research on Personalized Tutoring Mode for Academic English Writing Based on Peerceptive Online Peer Review System. Technology Enhanced Foreign Languages, 186(4), 25-33.
Kaufman J. H., & Schunn C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, (3), 13-19.
Lu L. (2016). Research on the Second Writing Process Based on Automated Evaluation Systems. Foreign Language World, 173(2), 88-96.
Patchan M. M. (2013). The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions. Instructional Science, (2), 381-382.
Schunn C. D. Godley A., DeMertino S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes. Journal of Adolescents and Adult literacy, 173(1), 112-113.
Xu, J. F., & Zhu, Q. (2019). Research on English Online Peer Review Based on the Peerceptive Peer Review System. Technology Enhanced Foreign Languages, 186(4), 10-16.
Zhang, F. H., Di, Y. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). Research on the Use of Peerceptiv Peer Review System to Assist Students in English Writing. Technology Enhanced Foreign Languages, 170(8), 38-44.
Zhang, F. H., Li, W. T., Long, M. Y., & Gao, Y. (2019). Comparative Study on the Effects of Self-Regulated Learning in Writing Based on Three Technological Platforms. Technology Enhanced Foreign Languages, 189(10), 22-26.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/13632
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Studies in Literature and Language
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture