A Brief Analysis of the Structural Devices in William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Chang ZHENG

Abstract


In this article, we have analyzed the structural devices Shakespeare has applied to A Midsummer Night’s Dream, by using formalistic criticism. The structural devices the great master has used are mainly dramatic plots with the focuses on dramatic conflicts, dramatic irony and thematic concerns.
The central component of dramatic plot is its dramatic conflict. The causes of dramatic conflicts are disorder among characters. The five stages of dramatic conflicts are the same with dramatic plots. They are exposition, rising actions, climax, falling actions and conclusion. The conclusion or denouement for comedy is that a comedy tends to endorse the values of society, sometimes at the expense of individual needs or values. Dramatic irony is another useful structural device. It means the fulfillment of a plan, action or expectation in a surprising way, often the opposite of what the characters intend. Thematic concerns are plots or dramatic actions to be put together and lead to the revelation of the theme.


Keywords


Formalistic Criticism; Structural Devices; Dramatic Plots; Dramatic Irony; Thematic Concerns

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaty, J., & Booth, A. (Eds.). (2002). The Norton Introduction to Literature (8th ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Daniell, D. (1986). Shakespeare and the Tradition of Comedy. In S. Wells (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies (pp. 108-109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glola, D., & Gwynn, R. S. (Eds.). (2006). The Art of the Short Story. New York: Pearson Longman.

Guerin, W. L., & Labor, E. (2004). A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hapgood, R. (1986). Shakespeare on Film and Television. In S. Wells (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies (pp. 273-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hunter, R. G. (1965). Shakespeare and the Comedy of Forgiveness. New York: Columbia University Press.

Levin, H. (1986). Critical Approaches to Shakespeare from 1660 to 1904. In S. Wells (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies (pp. 213-229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thornborrow, J., & Wareing, S. (1998). Patterns in Language: Stylistics for Students of Language and Literature. London: Taylor & Francis Limited.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/13419

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Studies in Literature and Language

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


 

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailoffice@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture