The Incorporation of Self-Questioning Training in the Reading Comprehension Course: The Case of Moroccan EFL University Learners
Abstract
This study sets out to examine the role of self-questioning training in improving EFL university learners’ reading potentiality. It shows the extent to which instruction in self-questioning, as a metacognitive strategic move, can reinforce the learners’ reading behavior in coping with the written discourse. To meet this objective, a total of 113 first-semester university students participated in this quasi-experimental study. The data were collected by means of such instruments as the reading texts (i.e., narrative, expository), ‘self-report questionnaire’ and self-questioning instruction. The experimental group received training in self-questioning during the reading comprehension sessions (14 sessions) whereas the subjects in the control group (50) took their regular classes. The results show that the learners in the treatment condition considerably improved at the level of self-questioning usage across the pre-post-treatment stage. Thus, the study recommends that the technique of self-questioning be teachable and worthy of central importance in the higher education context.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afzali, K. (2012). The impact of instructing self-questioning in reading literary texts. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 536-550.
Anani Sarab, M. R., & Reihani, M. S. (2010). Cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language reading test performance: The case of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 1-18.
Brown, A. L. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (pp.501-529). Washington, D.C.: National Reading Conference.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman.
Crabtree, T., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Konrad, M. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring of story elements on the reading comprehension of high school seniors with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0090
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2) 239-264.
Goodman, K. (1970). Reading as a psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell. (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Janssen, T. (2002). Instruction in self-questioning as a literary reading strategy: An exploration of empirical research. Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2(2), 95-120
King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking- Review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303-323.
Matlin, M. W. (2005). Cognition (6th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
McCallum, R. S., Krohn, K. R., Skinner, C. H., Hilton-Prillhart, A., Hopkins, M., Waller, S., & Polite, F. (2011). Improving reading comprehension of at-risk high-school students: The art of reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 78-86.
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking Reading comprehension instruction: A comparison for instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218-253.
Nolan, T. E. (1991). Self-questioning and prediction: Combining metacognitive strategies. Journal of Reading, 35 (2), 132-138.
Padrón, Y. N. (1992). The effect of strategy instruction on bilingual students’ cognitive strategy use in reading. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(3/4), 35-51.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Shang, H. F. (2011). Exploring the relationship between EFL proficiency level and reading strategy use. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 18-27
Shellings, G. (2011). Applying learning strategy questionnaires: Problems and possibilities. Research Institute Child Development and Education, 6, 91-109.
Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411-436.
Singer, H. (1978). Active comprehension: From answering to asking questions. Reading Teacher, 31(8), 901-908.
Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (3rd ed.). New York: CBS College Publishing.
Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2006). Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_1
Yang, Y. (2006). Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies? Reading Psychology, 27(4), 313-343
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11754
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Mohammed Maddek Msaddek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture