Studies in Literature and Language
Abuse Practice of Power in Orwell’s Animal Farm
Abstract
It occurs very often to observe the exploitation of common people by the politicians owing to leader’s bad use of his absolute power and the silence of the people. It appears that knowledge and education will lead to absolute power which culminates in suffering and oppression of simple and naïve people in the Soviet Union.
The language used in Animal Farm was not known by the majority and this leads to threat through different principles and laws. This enabled the leaders to exploit the others for their greedy desires and to do abnormal actions.
As a result of the use of a vague language and the implementation of fear tactics then creating laws to help them to manipulate others, they could convince them and then they invented lies at the interest of leaders. Yet the others due to their simplicities were easily convinced, while power could be used to serve the entire population of the Soviet Union.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barzinji, Latef Saeed Noori, and Mariwan N. Hasan Barzinji. “Religion and Identity in Ayad Akhtar’s American Dervish: A cultural study.” International Journal of Literature and Arts 4.4 (2016): 49-54.
Barzinji, Latef Saeed Noori, and Mariwan Nasradeen Hasan. “A modernist reading of ezra pound, Thomas Stearns Eliot and William Carlos Williams.”
Barzinji, M. (2015). Modernism: A critical introduction. Lap Lambert Academic Publ.
Barzinji, M. N. H. (2012). The image of modern man in T.S Eliot’s poetry. Bloomington: IN: Author House, 2012.
Barzinji, Mariwan N. Hasan. “The function of epigraphs to TS Eliot’s poetry.” Research on Humanities and Social Sciences (2015): 27-40.
Barznji, Mariwan N. H, and Latef S. N. Berzenji. T. S Eliot: Critical essays. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2017.
Business Dictionary.com. Web Finance,Inc. March 17, 2018 http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/Union-of-Soviet-SocialistRepublics-USSR.html
Gillies, M., Mahood, A., & Aurelea. (2007). Modernist literature: An introduction. Edinburgh: University Press.
Hasan, M. (2013). Modernism, modernity and modernization. Research on Humanities and Social Science, 3(2), 43-52.
Hasan, M. (2019). The explication of mythology and ecology in Eliot’s The Waste Land. Studies in Literature and Language, 19(1), 30-36.
Hasan, M. M. (2019). A thematic investigation into TS Eliot’s “The Hollow Men:” With reference to textual approach. Critical Literary Studies, 1, 159-184.
Hasan, M. N. (2015). The eighteenth century and the rise of the English novel. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 3(2), 18.
Hasan, M. N. (2016). The rise of modernism: A new history of western modernism. Journal of Kirkuk University Humanity Studies, 11(1), 1-42.
Hasan, M. N., & Hussein, S. A. (2015). The hurdles in front of women in expressing their voice in Eliot’s The Waste Land. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 3(6), 171-175.
Hasan, M. N., & Hussein, S. A.-B. (2016). Dante’s “The Divine Comedy”, Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” and Muhammed’s Isra and Miraj: A comparative study. International Review of Social Sciences, 4(2), 483-486.
Hasan, M. N., & Khdhir, C. H. (2019). Literary stylistics: Literature and language. Bloomington; IN: AuthorHouse.
Hasan, M. N., & Muhammed, S. A. (2017). The explication of loyalty and disloyalty in Farrokhzad’s “captive”. Al Kitab Journal for Humanity Sciences, 1(2).
Hasan, M. N., & Sayakhan, N. I. (2017). “Orwell’s anthropomorphic representation of politicians and common people in Animal Farm. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), ISSN 2356-5926, 4(3), 146-153.
Hasan, M. N., Noori, L. S., & HamaSalih, M. S. (2015). Mysticism and Sufism in T.S Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(9).
Hasan, M., Hsen, B., & Jalal, B. (2019). TS Eliot’s “Sweeney Erect” Revisited. Studies in Literature and Language, 19(2), 101-107.
Hirvisaari, J. (2016, Apr.). “Some Animal Are More Equal than Others”- A Posthumanist Reading of George Orwell’s “Animal Farm”. Tampere University: Tampere.
Inch, J. (2016). Communism and the betrayal of the revolution. University of Gavle: Gavle.
Kadečková, T. (2016). Dstopia and society: George Orwell and Ray Bradbury. Hradec Kralove University: Hradec Králové.
Khalida, M. (2012-2013). The use of personification in George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm. Kasdi Merbah University: Ouargla.
Kleinová, D. (2012). The uses of the fable in medieval and modern English literature. Masaryk University: Brno.
Letemendia, V. C. (1992). Revolution on Animal Farm: Orwell’s Neglected Commentary. Journal of Modern literature, 18(1), 127-137.
Machado, B. (2014). Utopia and dystopia in the host. Federal University: Apucarana.
Matz, J. (2004). The modern novel: A short Introduction. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Mohammed, D. A., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). T.S Eliot’s Murder in the Cathedral: A Reconsideration. International Review of Social Sciences, 5(1).
Mohammed, D. A., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). Occultism in Yeats’s “The Second Coming”: A Critical Interpretation. International Review of Social Sciences, 5(2).
Noori, L. S., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). Modern humans spiritual dilemma in Eliot’s Four Quartets. International Review of Social Sciences, 5(1).
Nousari, H. (2014-2015). Theme of corruption in George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm. Kasdi Merbah University; Ouargla.
Orwell, G. (2015). Animal Farm: With an Introduction by Symsom, Julian. London: Alfred A.knop: London.
Peterson, C. (2009). Wielding the human rights weapon: The United States, Soviet Union, and Private Citizens, 1975-1989. Ohio University: Athens.
Raza, S. (2016). The effects of totalitarianism and marxism towards dystopian society in George Orwell’s selected elected fictions. Global Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2(4), 21-37.
Relotic, I. (2015). George Orwell’s Animal Farm from utopia to dystopia. J. J. Strossmayer University: Osijek.
Rich, J. (2016). Animal Farm corruption. Bigham Young University: Provo, Utah.
Sebstain, V. J. (2001). The Theme of power in George Orwell’s postwar novels: Animal farm and nineteen eighty-four. University of Calicut: Theenjipalam.
Spurgin, T. (2006). Keynote address. The English novel. Los Angeles: Lawrence University.
Talabani, A. (2004). Symbolism and allegory in Orwell’s political novels. University of Sulaimany: Sulaimany.
Yeganeh, F. (2009). Literary schools: A reader. Tehran: Rahnama Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11532
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mariwan Nasradeen Hasan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net，or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
