Corporate Governance in China: A Study of the Interdependent Model
The article aims to develop a theoretical framework of interdependent model based on stated-owned enterprises and private enterprises. There are three steps of interdependence, that is subordination (before 1978), relaxation (from 1978 to 1992), and multiform interdependent (since 1993). During the progress of corporate governance, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) transfer from “danwei” (work unit society) to “enterprise”, however, private enterprises changes from “grass-root organization for making a living” to “enterprise”. In general, different enterprises gain different support from different government levels and different government levels rely on different types of enterprises to achieve their goals. SOEs internal management is concentrated within a single person who may have several titles. In private enterprise, power is often concentrated within a single owner. Private enterprise development necessarily depends upon this owner’s social network.
Key words: Interdependent model; State-Owned enterprises; Private enterprises
BAI, C. E., LIU, Q., LU, Joe, SONG, F. M., & ZHANG, J. X. (2005). An Empirical Study on Chinese Listed Firms’ Corporate Governance. Economic Research Journal, (2), 81-91.
Ewing R. D. (2005). Chinese Corporate Governance and Prospects for Reform. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(43), 317-338.
Gallagher M. E. (2005). Contagious Capitalism: Globalization and the Politics of Labor in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jean C. Oi (2004). Realms of Freedom in Post-Mao China. In William C. Kirby (Ed.), Realms of Freedom in Modern China (pp. 264-284). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
LI, S. Z. (2000). Chinese Cultural Tradition and Modernization. Strategy and Management, (4), 1-12.
LI, W. A. (2002). A Study of Modern Corporate Governance: Capital Structure, Corporate Governance, and Joint-Stock Reform of State-Owned Enterprises. China: China Renmin University Press.
LI, H. L., & LI, L. L. (1999). Resources and Exchange: The Interdependent Structure in the Chinese “Work Unit Society”. Sociological Research, (4), 44-63.
LIU, Guy S. (2005). Comparative Corporate Governance: The Experience Between China and the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(1), 1-4.
QIAN, Y. Y. (1995). Reforming Corporate Governance and Finance in China. Economic Research Journal, (1), 20-29.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Tam O. K. (1999). The Development of Corporate Governance in China. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
WU, J. L. (1994). Modern Company and Enterprise Reform. China: Tianjin People Publishing.
XU, Y. (2002). County Government, Township Faction, Village Governance: Structural Conversion of Rural Governance. Jiangsu Social Sciences, (2), 27-30.
YANG, R. L., & ZHOU Y. A. (1997). A Normative Analysis Framework of Corporate Ownership Arrangements and Its Theoretical Implications. Economic Research Journal, (1), 12-22.
YU, K. P. (2002). The Emerging of Civil Society and Its Significance to Governance in Reform China. China: Social Sciences of Academic Press (China).
ZHANG, W. Y. (1997). Thinking the Effectiveness, Problems and Outlets of the Reform of State-Owned Enterprises in China from the Perspective of Structure of Corporate Governance. Social Science Front, (2), 42-51.
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures
Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138