Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Iranian EFL Learners’ Performance on the Reading Section of the TOEFL iBT

Seyed Abolghassem Fatemi Jahromi, Alma Forouzan, Razieh Gholaminejad

Abstract


The present study attempted to find out which of the two variables of computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy can best predict Iranian EFL learners’ performance on the reading section of the TOEFL iBT and whether there is any relationship between computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. To this end, 75 English major participants, both male and female were administered two questionnaires including Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS) and Computer Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES), as well as the reading section of the TOEFL iBT. Also, the participants’ proficiency level was determined using their scores on the Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT). This study was carried out at Alzahra University, University of Tehran, and Allame Tabataba'ei University. The collected data were analyzed through multiple regression and correlation procedures. The findings revealed that there are no significant differences between computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy as predictors of Iranian EFL learners’ TOEFL iBT reading comprehension. Therefore, both independent variables were found to be effective in predicting learners’ performance, with the effect of self-efficacy being stronger. Additionally, a significant relationship was found between Iranian EFL learners’ computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. That is to say, computer anxiety modestly affects self-efficacy and vice versa. The results of the study may be helpful for both teachers and test takers.


Keywords


Computer Anxiety, Computer Self-Efficacy, TOEFL iBT, predictors of reading comprehension, technology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achim, N., & Al Kassim, A. (2015). Computer usage: the impact of computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 172, 701-708

Asadi Piran, N. (2014). The Relationship between Self-concept, Self-efficacy, Self-esteem and Reading Comprehension Achievement: Evidence from Iranian EFL learners. International J. Soc. Sci. & Education, Vol.5 Issue 1. 58-66

BalogÙlu, M., & Cevik, V. (2008). Multivariate effects of gender, ownership, and the frequency of use on computer anxiety among high school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2639–2648.

Beckers, J. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: A six-factor model. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 35-49.

Bozionelos, N. (2001). The relationship of instrumental and expressive traits with computer anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 955-974.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Canale, M. (1986). The promise and threat of computerized adaptive assessment of reading comprehension. Technology and language testing, 30–45. Washington, DC: TESOL Publications.

Chu, P. C., & Spires, E. C. (1991). Validating the computer anxiety rating scale: Effects of cognitive style and computer courses on anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 7–21.

Chua, S. L., Chua, D. T., Chen A. F., & Wong, L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609–623.

Cohen, A., & Upton, T. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. Monograph Series: ETS.

Colley, Ann M, Gale, Matthew T. & Harris, Teri A. (1994). Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of educational computing research, 10(2), 129-137.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.

Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research on Aging and Technology Enhancement. Psychology and Aging, 21, 333–352.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 983-1003.

Delcourt, M. A. B., & Kinzie, M. B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal or Research and Development in Education, 27, 35-41.

Dooey, P. (2008). Problems of transition to a new era. Language testing and technology. Department of Languages and Intercultural, 24(2).

Embi, R. (2007). Computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy among accounting educators at Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Malaysia.

Eyde, L. D., & Kowal, D. M. (1987). Computerized test interpretation services: Ethical and professional concerns regarding U.S. producers and users. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36(3-4), 401-417.

Fagan, M., & Neill, S. & Wooldridge (2004). An empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support and usage. Journal of Computer Information Systems, Winter 200.

Fox, J. (2003). From products to process: An ecological approach to bias detection. International Journal of Testing, 3, 21-48.

French, C. F. (1986). Microcomputers and psychometric assessment. British Journal of Guidance and counselling, 14, 33-45.

Fuller, R. M., Vician, C., & Brown, S. A. (2006). E-learning and individual characteristics: The role of computer anxiety and communication apprehension. The Journal of Computer Information Systems,46(4), 103-115.

Gardner, E., Render, B., Ruth, S., &; Ross, J. (1985). Human oriented implementation cures. cyber phobia. Data Management, 23, 29-46.

Harrington, K. V., McElroy, J. C., & Morrow, P. C. (1990). Computer anxiety and computer-based training: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 343-358.

Hauser, R., Paul, R., & Bradley, J. (2012). The impact of culture and computer self-efficacy in an online training environment. Proceedings of the Academy of Informationand Management Sciences 12, 19–22.

Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49-59.

Howard, G.S. and Smith, R. (1986). Computer anxiety in management: Myth or reality? Communications of the Acme, 29, 611-615.

Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Computer Usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.

Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989). A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward microcomputer. Journal of Management, 15(3), 373-388.

Lawrence, J. S. & Yigal, A. (2010). Test takers’ attitudes about the TOEFL iBT . TOEFL iBT Research Report, ETS, Princeton, New Jersey.

Leso, T., & Peck, K. L. (1992). Computer anxiety and different types of computer courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(4), 469_478.

Matthews, D., & Shrum, L. (2003). High-speed Internet use and academic gratifications in the college residence. Internet and Higher education, 6(2), 125–144

McDonald, A. S. (2002). The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Computers & Education, 39(3), 299-312.

Most, R. (1987). Levels of error in computerized psychological inventories. Applied Psychology: An International Review,36(3/4), 375-383.

Murphy, C. A., Coover, D., & Owen, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893-899.

Ortner, T. M., & Caspers, J. (2011). Consequences of test anxiety on adaptive versus fixed item testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 157-163.

Rosen, L.D., & Maguire, P. (1990). Myths and realities of computer phobia: A met analysis. Anxiety Research, 3, 175-191.

Saade, R. G., Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self- efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 177-191.

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 103–112.

Singleton, C. H. (1997). Computer-based assessment of reading. Psychological assessment of reading (pp. 257-278). London: Routledge.

Teo, T., & Koh, J. H. L. (2010). Assessing the dimensionality of computer self-efficacy among pre service teachers in Singapore: a structural equation modeling approach. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Information Commun. Technol, 6(3), 7-18.

Torkzadeh, G., & Angulo, I. E. (1992). The concept and correlates of computer anxiety. Behavior and Information Technology, 11, 99-108.

Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart, 24(1), 115–139.

Woodrow, J. (1991). A comparison of four computer attitude scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 165-187.

Zhang, Y., & Espinoza, S. (1998). Relationships among computer self-efficacy, attitudes toward computers, and desirability of learning computing skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 30(4), 420-436.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Razieh Gholaminejad

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 9375 Rue de Roissy Brossard, Québec, J4X 3A1, Canada 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailcaooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures