Reform of Training Ways of Engineering Practice and Innovation Ability for Petroleum Engineering Students

Mingxing BAI, Jiangpeng SUN, Kaoping SONG, Wanli ZOU

Abstract


To improve the students’ ability of engineering practice and innovation, Petroleum Engineering Experiment Teaching Center reformed the training ways, including construction of two-way practice teaching system, reform of the experimental teaching organization and management mode, experimental teaching mode, experimental teaching contents, experimental teaching assessment methods, form and content of college students’ extracurricular scientific activities, etc.. These help to form the good situation of independent learning and independent experiments, training students’ engineering capability and innovative capability, which have achieved fruitful results in practice.


Keywords


Engineering practice ability; Innovation ability; Teaching system; Experimental teaching; Teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carpenter, C. (2013). Technical master class: A new approach to knowledge transfer. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 150-153.

Chen, J., Lord, S., & McGaughey, C. (2014). Assessing Engineering Students as Lifelong Learners. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(5), 1063-1071.

Kappel, H., Lehmann, B., & Loeper, J. (2002). Distance education at conventional universities in Germany. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2).

Kawworm, C., & Hemmingsen, L. (2007). Preparing professionals for lifelong learning: comparative examination of master’s education programs. Higher Education, 54(3), 449-468.

Lattuca, L., Bergom, I., & Knight, D. (2014). Professional development, departmental contexts, and use of instructional strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 549-572.

Li, Y., Wang, C., & Ha, M. (2015). On the cultivation mode of petroleum engineering professionals in higher vocational education. Higher Education of Social Science, 8(1), 132-136.

Lin, W., & Yueh, H. (2014). Electronic pet robots for mechatronics engineering education: A project-based learning approach. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 231-239.

Splitt, F. (2004). Engineering education reform: Sign of progress. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(6), 1005-1011.

Strong, D. (2012). An approach for improving design and innovation skills in engineering education: The multidisciplinary design stream. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(5), 339-348.

Zoltowski, C., Oakes, W., & Assistant, M. (2012). Student’s ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28-59.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Higher Education of Social Science



Share us to:   

 

Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net，or  hess@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


 


 Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures