Fragmentation and Unity of Rural Public Governance: A Case Study on Lin’an City in China

Zhihong ZENG, Xiaoying ZENG

Abstract


The township, as the most basic political system in China, a head of which is connected to a city, and the another head connected with the countryside, is the foundation of national economic and social development. In the face of strong intervention of economic globalization, the gradually weakening of local township government, and the increasingly tense of national finance, agricultural and rural development policy, which is presently ubiquitous in the rural area of China, stressed from top to bottom, expert guidance, government-dominated promoting, will face the serious challenges of rural governance under the background of globalization. The rural governance is that the national institutions and other authorities based on the village government provides public service activities to the village society, in order to maintain rural order, promote rural development, according to the laws, regulations, customs and traditions. And rural governance is the process of multi subjects’ collaborative management of rural village. Rural governance quality reflects the ability of government’s rural social mobilization and management, and relates to the stable development and prosperity of rural society. The current problems of township governance, mainly are not the “township”problems of its own, but the “institutions and mechanisms of government”problem. This article takes the Lin’an city of Zhejiang province as the research object, through the development of villages and towns work rules in the process of tracking, puts forward a good example of rural governance in china.


Keywords


Rural public governance; Fragmentation; Unity; Lin’an

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jessop B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, (155), 29-45.

Global governance. (1995). The books and study commission reports on the subject include the Commission on Global Governance, our global neigborhood. New York: Oxford University Press. Published by Lynne Rienner Publishers in Cooperation with the Academic Council on the United Nations [ACUNS] and the United Nations University.

The Countryside in the 21st Century- British-Germans Perspective. (September, 2002). Conference on Rural Policy, Rural Governance and Contemporary Countryside in Britain and Germany, 3-7.

Thomas P. Bernstein, & Xiao-bo L. (2000, September). Taxation without representation: Peasants, the central and the local states in reform China. China Quarterly, (163).

Brunori, G., & Rossi, A., (2007). Differentiating coutryside: Social representations and governance patterns in rural areas with high social density: The case of Chianti, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 183-205.

Clark, D., Southern, R., & Beer, J. (2007). Rural governance, community empowerment and the new institutionalism: A case study of the Isle of Wight. Journal of Rural Studies, 23.

Wang, S., Yao, Y. (2007). Grassroots democracy and local governance: Evidence from rural China. World Development, 35(10), 1635–1649.

Zhang, X., Fan, S., Zhang, L., & Huang, J. (2004). Local governance and public goods provision in rural China. Journal of Public Economics, 88(12), 2857–2871.

Atchoarena David (2006). The evaluation of international cooperation in education: A rural perspective. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(1), 59–70. CICE Hiroshima University.

Sonneveld, M. (2007). Sustainable regional development, green agenda training seminar for Romanian and Bulgarian NGO’s. Tirgu Mures, Romania, 24-26, February 2007. Report of the input of Dutch experiences and examples frompractice.

Jing, Y. J. (2002). Elaboration of the significance of self-governance among villagers and theorized experimentation. Research on China’s Rural Areas, China’s Rural Problems Research Center of Central China Normal University, (Volume of 2001, pp.87-117). China Social Sciences Publishing House.

Tsai, Lily Lee (2007). Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. American Political Science Review, 101, 355-372.

Brooks, Arthur C. (2005). Does social capital make you generous?. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 1-15.

Perret, S., Carstens, J., Randela, R., & Moyo, S. (2000). Activity systems and livelihoods in the Eastern Cape Province rural areas (Transkei): Household typologies as socio-economic contributions to a LandCare project . University of Pretoria / CIRAD, working paper 2000/28, oct. 2000, 35p.

Hemson, D., Meyer, M., & Maphunye, K. (2004, January). Rural development: The provision of basic infrastructure services. HSRC, integrated rural and regional development. Position Paper, Pretoria, South Africa.

Davids, I. (2003). Developmental local government: The rural context and challenges. Development Update, 4(1) 31- 54.

Perret, S., & Mercoiret, M-R. (Eds.). (2003). Supporting small-scale farmers and rural organisations: Learning from experiences in western Africa. A handbook for development operators and local managers. Protea- CIRAD Publ., Pretoria, South Africa, 320p. 




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2F4049

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; css@cscanada.net; css@cscanada.org

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture

Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138

Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org

E-mail:css@cscanada.net, css@cscanada.org