Translation, Interpretation and Culture: On the Disingenuity of a Comparative Theology

S. N. Balagangadhara

Abstract


In this three-part article, I look at Francis Clooney’s work on comparative theology, identify one of the crucial problems of translation that comparative studies confront and outline the nature of a task for the twenty-first century cross-cultural theology. In the first part, I show that there is no unique ‘translation problem’ but that it actually names a plethora of problems. Such problems include not only the translation of texts across languages but also the philosophical problems of incommensurability of theories and inter-theoretic reductions. In the second part, I undertake a fairly close examination of aspects of Clooney’s enterprise. Here, I show that, quite contrary to what he promises, his project simply rehashes old dogmas of earlier Christian writers albeit in a hidden and implicit manner. In the third part, I suggest that we need to rethink some of the ingrained but hardly orthodox assumptions, if we intend to understand the cultures and practices which are other than those in the West. I suggest that a new theological practice is more adequate to our times than what we have inherited from the past.

Keywords


Comparative theology; Hinduism; Christianity; India; Translation; Culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almond, P. (1988). The British discovery of Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Atran, S. (1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history: Towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Balagangadhara, S. N. (2005). The heathen in his blindness…: Asia, the west and the dynamics of religion (2nd ed.). Delhi: Manohar Publishers.

Balzer, W., Pearce, D., & Schmidt, H. (eds.). (1984). Reduction in science. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Bickle, J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction: The new wave. MA: MIT Press. Bloch, E., Keppens, M., & Hegde, R. (Eds.). (2011). Rethinking religion in India: The colonial construction of Hinduism. London: Routledge.

Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

Clooney, F. X. (2010). Comparative theology: Deep learning across religious borders. London: Blackwell Publishing.

Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. New York: Houghton Mufflin.

Dennett, D. (2007). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin.

Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 3: Scientific explanation, space, and time (pp.28-97). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hodgen, M. T. (1988). Early anthropology in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Hooker, C. A. (1981). Towards a general theory of reduction. Part I: Historical and Scientific Setting. Part II: Identity in Reduction. Part III: Cross-Categorial Reduction, Dialogue 20 (pp.38-59, 201-236, 496-529).

Hoyningen-Huene, P., & Sankey, H. (Ed.). (2001). Incommensurability and related matters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Kay, P., & Willet, K. (1984). What is the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis?. American Anthropologist, 86, 65-79.

Kors, A. C. (1990). Atheism in France, 1650-1729: The orthodox sources of disbelief. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lach, D. (1994). Asia in the making of Europe, Volume I: The century of discovery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

McEvilley, T. (2002). The shape of ancient thought: Comparative studies in Greek and Indian philosophies. New York: Allworth Press.

Neill, S. (2002). A history of Christianity in India: 1707-1858. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Patricia Churchland. (1986). Neurophilosophy. MA: MIT Press.

Phillips Roberts, C. (1986). The sociology of religious knowledge in the Roman Empire to A.D. 284. In H. Temporini & W. Haase (Eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt: Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der Neuren Forschung, 16.3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. MA: MIT Press.

Ruether, R. (1974). Faith and fratricide: The theological roots of anti-semitism. New York: Wipf & Stock.

Sankey, H. (1994). The incommensurability thesis. London: Ashgate.

The Acts. The New Jerusalem Bible.

Wiedemann, T. (1990). Polytheism, monotheism, and religious co-existence: Paganism and Christianity in the Roman Empire. In Ian Hamnet (Ed.), Religious pluralism and unbelief: Studies critical and comparative. London: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture