Deconstructing the “Fourth Wall”: Metatheatricality in Plautus’ Miles Gloriosus and Osofisan’s Tegonni

E. F. Taiwo

Abstract


The Roman theatrical tradition owes a great deal to the spirit of Greek theatre in antiquity, particularly as pioneered by Menander in New Comedy. The reception and subsequent reputation of the Greek theatrical convention among Plautus’ audience, has recently been attributed to his skilful re-theatricalisation of the alien drama through the use of what scholars have variously identified as metatheatre, -the self-referentiality of drama. The use of this technique has called attention to the highly metafictional world of Plautine drama and in this case, his Miles Gloriosus, which has also been emphasized as metatheatrical. The contemporary Nigerian theatre practitioner/playwright, Femi Osofisan, has also shown metatheatrical moments in his works. Osofisan’s Tegonni, has betrayed a reception of such metatheatricality as identified in Plautus’ Miles Gloriosus. But beyond hosting own critique, both plays portray an undercurrent of events privileging a socio-cultural hermeneutics, whose currency subsists even in contemporary climes.
The paper examines the reception of Plautine metatheatrical techniques and its attendant socio-cultural interpretations in Miles Gloriosus, and in post-colonial Nigerian drama through a reading of Femi Osofisan’s Tegonni, an African Antigone.


Keywords


Theatricality; Plautus; Plautine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Awodiya, M. P. (1995). The drama of Femi Osofisan: A critical perspective. Ibadan: Kraft Books.

Crow, B. (2002). African metatheater: Criticising society, celebrating the stage. RAL, 33(1), 133-143.

Dunton, C. (1992). Make man talk true: Nigerian drama in English since 1970. London: Hans Zell publishers.

Fraenkel, E. (1960). Elementi plautini in Plauto (Florence).

Frangoulidis, S. (1994). Palaestrio as playwright: Plautus Miles Gloriosus 209-212. In C. Deroux (Ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, 7 (Brussels), 72-86

Deroux, C. (Ed.). Studies in Latin literature and Roman history, 7 (Brussels) (pp.72-86).

Frangoulidis, S. (1996). A prologue-within-a-prologue: Plautus, Miles Gloriosus, (pp.145-153). Latomus, 55, 568-70.

Goff, B., & Simpson, M. (2007). Crossroads in the black aegean: Oedipus, antigone, and dramas of the African diaspora. Oxford.

Kirichenko, A. (2007). Writing like a clown: Apuleius' metafiction and Plautus’ Metatheater (p.206). Online article.

Knapp (1999). On ludi in Plautus referring to games in theatrical performances (p.45).

Maurice, L. (2007). Structure and stagecraft in Plautus Miles Gloriosus. Mnemosyne Fourth Series, 60, 407-426.

Moore, T. J. (1998). The Theater of Plautus. Playing to the audience. Austin.

Muecke, F. (1986). Plautus and the theatre of disguise, CA 5, pp.216-29.

Okoye, C. (2010). African theatre and the performance turn. New England Theatre Journal, 21.

Okoye, C. (2011). Deference and defiance: African theatre and Femi Osofisan’s signifying difference. Studies in Theatre and Performance, 32(3).

Osofisan, F. (1998). Playing dangerously: Drama at the frontiers of terror in a ‘postcolonial’ state. Ibadan: University of Ibadan.

Osofisan, F. (1999). Recent outings: Tegonni, an African Antigone.

Rabinowitz, P. J. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Columbus.

Rosenmeyer, T. G. (2002). Metatheater: An essay on overload. Arion, 10, 87-119.

Stephen, G. (1980). Renaissance self–fashioning: From more to Shakespeare. Chicago.

Stephen, G. (1980). The improvisation of power (p.227).

Slater, N. W. (1985). Plautus in performance: The theatre of the mind. Princeton.

Sifakis, G. M. (1971). Parabassis and animal choruses. London.

Styan, J. L. (1975). Drama, stage and audience. Cambridge.

Tompkins, J. (1995). Spectacular resistance: Metatheartre in post-colonial Drama. Modern Drama. Toronto, 38(1), 42-51.

Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge, MA.

Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction: The theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. London –New York.

Weyenberg, V. (2011). Revolutionary muse: Femi Osofisan’s Tegonni: An African Antigone. In Classical Presences (Eds.). Steve Wilmer and Androne Zukauskaite. Oxford University Press.

Weyenberg, V. (2007). Antigone as Revolutionary Muse: Femi Osofisan’s Tegonni: An African Antigone. Journal of African Literature and culture, 4.

Wright (1974). Stressed the sophistication of Plautus’ audience (pp.183-96).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture