Explaining the Role of U.S. Space and Satellite Power in Enhancing the Geopolitical Weight of the United States

Mohsen Zamani

Abstract


Space power has, in recent decades, become one of the fundamental components of national power. The United States, possessing the most advanced space infrastructure, extensive satellite networks, and superior technological and military capabilities, has significantly strengthened its geopolitical position within the international system. This article aims to explain the role of U.S. space and satellite power in enhancing the country’s geopolitical weight. It examines the interconnections between space technologies, national security, international political economy, and the global power structure. The central research question is how, and through which mechanisms, U.S. space power has contributed to the elevation of its geopolitical status at regional and global levels.
Within its theoretical framework, the study draws upon modern geopolitics, the theory of smart power, and the concept of “outer space as a strategic domain.” It argues that space is no longer merely a scientific or technological arena but has evolved into a decisive field in great-power competition. Through the development of satellite systems in communications, navigation (GPS), reconnaissance and intelligence surveillance, meteorology, early warning, and precision-guided weapons, the United States has constructed a multilayered network of informational and operational superiority that consolidates its geopolitical dominance. In this sense, outer space has become the invisible yet vital infrastructure underpinning the U.S.-centered international order.
From a security-military perspective, U.S. space capabilities play a crucial role in enhancing Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR). Reconnaissance and intelligence satellites enable global monitoring of rival military movements, while navigation and communication satellites significantly increase the precision of military operations and coordination of forces. This informational advantage not only strengthens U.S. deterrence but also expands its capacity for intervention and crisis management worldwide. The establishment of the United States Space Force further reflects the institutionalization of space as an independent operational domain within America’s grand strategy of national security.
Economically, U.S. satellite power constitutes the backbone of the global digital economy. Satellite-based communication infrastructures support internet services, financial transactions, global transportation, and supply chain management. American corporations such as SpaceX, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin—alongside other private-sector actors—have integrated technological capitalism with national strategy, generating a form of “corporate geopolitics” that simultaneously advances U.S. economic and geopolitical interests. Consequently, space power has emerged as a primary driver of American economic hegemony.
From the perspective of information geopolitics, U.S. dominance over space infrastructure has enabled it to produce and distribute geospatial data and strategic information on a global scale. Such data play a key role in agriculture, energy, climate change monitoring, disaster management, and urban planning, thereby increasing other countries’ dependence on U.S. space services. This technological dependency functions as a subtle yet effective instrument of political influence and alliance-building. In other words, U.S. space power operates not only as a tool of hard power but also as a mechanism of soft and smart power projection.
At the level of grand geopolitical competition, U.S. space superiority plays a decisive role in balancing power with rivals such as China and Russia. The development of anti-satellite systems, competition over satellite constellations, and efforts toward the militarization of space demonstrate that outer space has become a central arena of great-power rivalry. Nevertheless, the United States maintains a leading position due to its historical experience, extensive alliance networks, innovative private sector, and substantial research and development budgets. This advantage enhances America’s geopolitical weight in international negotiations, rule-making processes in space governance, and the shaping of legal regimes related to outer space.
The findings indicate that U.S. space power increases the country’s geopolitical weight through three principal mechanisms: first, by establishing informational and operational superiority in the security-military domain; second, by consolidating America’s position in the global economy through control of critical space-based infrastructures; and third, by expanding political and technological influence through other states’ dependence on U.S. satellite services and data. The interaction of these three dimensions generates strategic synergy, reinforcing the United States’ position at the apex of the global power hierarchy.
In conclusion, outer space has become a key dimension of contemporary geopolitics, and the United States, recognizing its significance early on, has integrated space power into the core of its grand strategy. Space power serves not only as an instrument for strengthening U.S. military and economic capabilities but also as a mechanism for reproducing and sustaining a U.S.-centered international order. Therefore, future shifts in the global balance of power will be closely linked to developments in the space domain and competition over the control of satellite infrastructures.


Keywords


Space Power; Satellites; Geopolitics; United States; National Security; Global Hegemony

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dolman, E. C. (2002). Astropolitik: Classical geopolitics in the space age. Frank Cass Publishers.

Douhet, G. (2009). The command of the air(R. Dino Ferrari, Trans.). Air Force History and Museums Program. (Original work published 1921)

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351

Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187

Hobe, S. (2019). Space law. In R. Wolfrum (Ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press.

Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton University Press.

Johnson-Freese, J. (2017). Space warfare in the 21st century: Arming the heavens. Routledge.

Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2020). Joint all-domain command and control strategy.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company.

Lutes, C., & Hitchens, T. (2011). Space power and national security. National Defense University Press.

Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/1775498

Mahan, A. T. (1890). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660-1783. Little, Brown and Company.

McDougall, W. A. (1985). …The heavens and the earth: A political history of the space age. Basic Books.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.

Nye, J. S. (2011). The future of power. PublicAffairs.

Oberg, J. (2019). Space security and global politics. Routledge.

O’Hanlon, M. (2018). The Senkaku paradox and U.S. space strategy. Brookings Institution.

Space Foundation. (2023). The space report 2023: The annual assessment of the global space industry. https://www.spacefoundation.org

Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge University Press.

Tellis, A. J. (2007). China’s military space strategy. Survival, 49(3), 41-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330701564706

United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. (1967). Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies. United Nations.

U.S. Department of Defense. (2020). Summary of the 2020 defense space strategy: Sharpening the American military’s competitive edge in space. https://www.defense.gov

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.

Weinzierl, M. (2018). Space, the final economic frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.2.173




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/14013

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture