Canadian Social Science
Beyond Visual Metaphor: A Cognitive Interaction between Metaphor and Metonymy in Filming Visual Rhetorical Image of the Statue of Liberty
Abstract
It was the boom of image transmission that accelerates a series of emerging interdisciplinary researches on visual rhetoric. The aim of this study is to investigate a cognitive function model of how metaphtonymy interaction takes place with cross-interaction of meaning operation and visual structure along with progressive imagery and values transfer both in source domain and target domain of visual metaphor. It results in two important findings: one comes from the exemplification of Top Ten Film Appearances of the Statue of Liberty where an active interaction might often operates between visual metaphor and metonymy either in metaphorical source domain or target domain or even in the both, during which four types of visual rhetorical figures, mainly represented by visual connection-related juxtaposition, visual opposition-related juxtaposition, visual connection-related fusion, visual connection-related replacement, more possibly interprets three steps of the target imagery transfer from archetypal imagery to conceptual image and last to symbolic imagery of the Statue of Liberty. It also unveils two levels of values shift from heuristic one to terminal one. The other finding attributes to a cognitive function model of interaction between metaphor and metonymy based on Liu’s model (2018) and a typology of visual rhetoric showing classification of ad examples (Phillips and McQuarrie, 2004) together with Liu’s (2011) three types of imagery transfer and Rokeach Values Scale. The first finding initially connects visual production to psychological cognition of imagery and values transfer. It paves a way to explore visual metaphor from a psychological cognitive point of view beyond advertising. The latter one, following Liu (2018), systematically rebuilds and exemplifies a cognitive model of metaphtonymy interaction, which can not only provide a significant guidance for audience to do critical thinking and rational judgment when consuming visual metaphors, but also contribute to visual products’ good quality and GAPP’ s effective supervision of visual products circulation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of Berkeley Press. (Original work published 1950)
Cai, C. C. (2010). Analysis of Nanking! Nanking! The image visual rhetoric of Schindler’s List. Film Review, 1, 45-46.
Du, P. X. (2017). The visual rhetoric art of Gonzalez’s films. Film Literature, 17, 92-94.
Feng, B. Q. (2010). Analysis on the internal structure system of picture-text rhetoric of graphic advertisements. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 8:55-58.
Forceville, C.. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge, London.
Furtado, K. (1986). The statue of liberty. Penguin Books.
Hill, C. A. (2004). The psychology of rhetorical images. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetoric. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hill, C. A., & Helmers, M. (2004). Defining visual rhetorics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335528124
Johnson, L. M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453-486.
Kashanizadeh, Z. et al. (2019) Designing a Typology for Visual Rhetoric with a Focus on the Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Print Advertising
Lagerwerf, L., Van Hooijdonk, C. M. J., & Korenberg, A. (2012). Processing visual rhetoric in advertisements: interpretations determined by verbal anchoring and visual structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1836-1852.
Li, C. C., Wang, H. R. (2012). A brief discussion on visual symbols and visual rhetoric in TV advertisements. Film Review, 20, 85-86.
Liu, T. (2011). The construction and production of cultural imagery: Exploring the psychological operation mechanism of visual rhetoric. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 9, 20-25.
Liu, T. (2016). China in western data journalism: A visual rhetoric analysis framework. Journalism & Communication Research, 23(02), 5-28+126.
Liu, T. (2017). Metaphor theory: Cross-domain mapping and visual rhetoric analysis. Journal of Social Sciences of Hunan Normal University, 46(06), 140-148.
Liu, T. (2018). On image: “Image” in meaning and visual rhetoric analysis. Journalism Bimonthly, 4, 1-9+149.
Liu, T. (2018).Metaphor and metonymy: From language to image. Journalism, 12, 33-46.
Maes, A., Schilperoord, J.. (2008). Classifying visual rhetoric: Conceptual and structural heuristics. In: McQuarrie, E.F., Phillips, B.J. (Eds.), Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(June), 37-54.
McQuarrie, E.F., Phillips, B.J.. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising. How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7-20.
Phillips, B. J., & Mcquarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: a new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1), 113-136.
Pound E. (1989). Review. Recording Huang Jinkai: Symbolism and imagism. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
Qin, X. (2018). Visual rhetoric in photojournalism of catastrophic events: A case study of the 2018 “Hose” and “Pulitzer Prize” Winning Works. Youth Journalist, 23, 50-51.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. The essence of human nature. Zondervan Pub. House.
Tan, S. M. (2019). Visual rhetoric practice of Chinese image in political communication -- A case study of New York Times’ “China Rules”. Youth Journalist, 20, 25-26.
Ventalon, G., Erjavec, G., & Tijus, C. (2020). Processing visual metaphors in advertising: an exploratory study of cognitive abilities. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 1-11.
Wang, C. Q. (2019). Emotional stimulation and imagery expression: The research on audience visual frameworks of new media events image communication. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 41(10), 75-99.
Wang, X. H. (2015). On historical evolution and connotation expansion of video political rhetoric. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 37(08), 19-23.
Wu, H. (2017). Research on visual rhetoric in anti-corruption documentary Forever on the Road. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 39(07), 119-128.
Yang, D. M. (2017). Visual rhetoric of Chinese films. Film Literature, 11, 16-18.
Yang, Z. Y. (2019). The “Alchemy” of video: On the ideology and rhetoric of poetic documentary. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 41(02), 114-118.
Yin, Q., & Yuan, X. (2018). Visual rhetoric of presidential images: Visual rhetoric of presidential images: An analysis of the white house messaging in flickr images. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 40(12), 137-143.
YouTube. (2012). Top 10 film appearances of the statue of liberty. Retrieved from http://www.watchmojo.com.
Zhao, N., & Peng, F. K. (2019). Visual rhetoric of luxury brands in cross-cultural communication: Taking “Chinese new year” symbol as an example. Youth Journalist, (14), 18-19.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12145
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
