Analysis of the Influence of the Penalty on the Cooperative Behavior Based on Netlogo Computer Simulation

Lin JIANG, Yueliang SU

Abstract


At present, cooperative behavior is mainly in three aspects: theoretical research, computer simulation and empirical analysis. The basic research paradigm including the game method and peer evaluation method. This paper research based on multi agent is designed and implemented a cooperative bank system based on Netlogo platform, in the system to study whether the effects of punishment on cooperative behavior. Through the Netlogo simulation model and analysis of the operation, if there is no social punishment selfish people will be more likely to survive. In order to make the environment conducive to cooperation, this paper establishes the penalty system.


Keywords


Cooperative behavior; Computer simulation; Netlogo; Penalty system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nowak, M., & Highfield, R. (2011). Altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. New York: Free Press; Reprint Edition.

Nowak, A. M. (2006). Five rules of the evolution of cooperation. Science, (314), 1560-1563.

Pillot, A. C., & Morvan, H. P. (2014). CFD simulationof an aeroengine bearing chamber using an enhanced Volume Of Fluid (VOF) method: An evaluation using adaptive meshing/ /Düsseldorf, Germany: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2014, GT2014-26405.

Ruan, W. J., Wang, B. B., & Li, Y., et al. (2012). Customer response behavior in time-of-use price. Power System Technology, 36(7), 86-93．

Spekman, R. E., Theodore, M., Forbes, I., & Isabella, L. A., et al. (1998). Alliance management: A view from the past and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 6(35), 747-772.

Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1(46), 35-57.

Wu, Y., Hu, J., et al. (2011). Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: Does the initial ownership play a role? Plos One, 6(7).

Weber, J., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 3(8), 281-307.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Lin JIANG

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

Reminder

  • We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

    The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

    Please send your manuscripts to mse@cscanada.net，or mse@cscanada.org  for consideration.

    We look forward to receiving your work.

 


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; mse@cscanada.net; mse@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Management Science and Engineering are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Editorial Office

Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures