The Coordination of Group Preference Based on Compatible Relation

Yingying WU

Abstract


A number of theoretical approaches to preference relations for multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problem. Consistency among the preference relations is very important to the result of the final decision. This paper is proposed procedure which based on compatible preference relation sets to solve multiple attribute group decision making problems. These sets are satisfied all experts additive consistency and determine weight of expert on every attribution. Moreover, we can adjust assessment of expert though the sets. Finally a numerical example is used to test the proposed approach and the results illustrate that the method is simple, effective, and practical.


Keywords


Multiple attribute group decision making; Compatible preference relation; Opinion coordination mechanism; Weight distribution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boz´oki, S. (2008). Solution of the least squares method problem of pairwise comparison matrices. Central European Journal of Operations Research (CEJOR), 16(4), 345-358.

Chen, J. Z., & Xu, J. P. (2008). Interactive TOPSIS method and application under a fuzzy environment. Journal of Systems Engineering, 26(4), 1-7.

Enrique, H. V., Herrera, F., & Chiclana, F. (2002). A consensus model for multi-person decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 32(3), 394-402.

Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 98-109.

Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Chiclana, F. (2001). Multiple decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(2), 372-385.

Olcer, A. I., & Odabasi, A. Y. (2005). A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 166(1), 93-114.

Sun, X. D., & Tian, P. (2008). Assembly methods in group decision making based on consistency intensity. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 30(10), 1895-1898.

Wang, J. X., & Wang, W. J. (2007). The consistency of fuzzy analysis group decision-making group opinion. Journal of Systems Engineering, 22.

Xu, X. H., & Chen, X. H. (2008). Research on multi-attribute large group decision alternative. Journal of System Engineering, 23(4), 137-141.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Management Science and Engineering



Share us to:   

Reminder

  • We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

    The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

    Please send your manuscripts to mse@cscanada.net，or mse@cscanada.org  for consideration.

    We look forward to receiving your work.

 


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; mse@cscanada.net; mse@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Management Science and Engineering are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Editorial Office

Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures