Attitudes of Students of Medicine Toward Oral Presentations as Part of Their ESP (English for Specific Purposes) Course

Giti Karimkhanlooei

Abstract


This article takes a functional approach to examine the attitudes of medical students toward oral presentations in English for specific purposes (ESP) courses by focusing on the performances delivered by the students to catch the precise attitude in respect of the effectivity. The article reflects on the shift of attention from sole teacher-centered classes via helping learners to communicate in the globalized age of knowledge by means of emphasis on oral presentations. This approach considers the students’ viewpoints about implementing oral presentations in ESP classes. The attitudes, meanwhile, adhere to learners’ problems which hinder them to be active participants and presenters in their classes. However, there are controversies about the appropriateness and constraints of oral presentations by students in an ESP and EFL learning environment. It seems that with meticulous structured planning and organization, oral presentations can lead to valuable for both learners and teachers. While, such activities account for a break away from textbooks, but provide for students such a learning setting that they attend classes with preplanning and excitement. The introduction of oral presentations to ESP classrooms encourages learners in training themselves to have confident presentations in public. This fact is especially true for students of medicine who find themselves in need of taking part at international programs where they need to speak out their research findings and science-based academic developments.


Keywords


English for Specific Purposes(ESP); Oral presentation; Students of medicine; Teaching English

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwi, N. F. B., & Sidhu, G. K. (2013). Oral presentation: Self-perceived competence and actual performance among UiTM Business faculty students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 98-106. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.070

Al-Issa, S., & Al-Qubtan, R. (2012). TESOL Journal, 227-246.

Brown, H. D. (1991).TESOL at twenty-five: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 245-60.

Brown, H., & Douglas, D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. N. J.: Prentice Hall.

Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93-121.

Davies, P., & Pearse, E. (2000). Success in English teaching. OUP Oxford.

Hill, M., & Storey, A. (2003). Speak easy: Online support for oral presentation skills. ELT Journal Volume, 57
(4).

Hutchinson & Torres. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. English Language Teaching Journal, 48(4), 315-28.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: CUP

Joughin, G. (2007). Student conceptions of oral assessment in oral presentations., 32(3), 323-336.

Karimkhanlouei, G. (2012). What do medical students need to learn in their English classes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 571-577.

Kobayashi, M. (2003). The role of peer support in ESL students’ accomplishment of oral academic tasks. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 337-368.

Mazdayasna, G. (2012). Objective assessment of oral presentations and EFL learners’ speaking development. Sheikh Bahaee EFL Journal, 1(1), 23-38.

Morita, N. (2000). Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate program. TESOL Quarterly, 3(2), 279-310.

Morita, N., & Kobayashi, M. (2008). Academic Discourse Socialization in a Second Language. In P. A. Duff & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol.8): Language socialization (2nd ed., pp.243-255). Berkeley: Springer.

Otoshi, J., & Heffernan, N. (2008). Factors predicting effective oral presentations in EFL classrooms. Asian EFL Journal, 10(1). Retrieved November 3 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/March_08_jo.php

Turner, K., Roberts, L., Heal, C., & Wright, L. (2013). Oral presentation as a form of summative assessment in a master’s level PGCE module: The student perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 662-673.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Zappa-Hollman, S. (2007). Academic presentations across post-secondary contexts: The discourse socialization of non-native English speakers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(4), 455-485.

Weissberg, B. (1993). The graduate seminar: Another research process genre. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 23-36.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9533

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Giti Karimkhanlooei

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 9375 Rue de Roissy Brossard, Québec, J4X 3A1, Canada 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailcaooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures