On Writing Strategies of Enhancing Students’ Writing Skills
Abstract
This thesis, by means of contrastive analysis, conducts a discussion of the factors that affect students’ English writing. The perspective of language transfer, small vocabulary, insufficient writing skills, culture differences, and different writing styles are mentioned in the next section. Under the guidance of constructivism theory, this paper proposes some effective teaching strategies to improve students’ writing level and some writing strategies to enhance students’ writing skills. By this detailed probe into students’ writing situation, the author aims to give some useful suggestions to contribute to English writing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Benjamin, R., & Chun, M. (2003). A new field of dreams: The collegiate learning assessment project. Peer Review, 5(4), 26-29.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R. D., Augsberger, A., & Garcia, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(3), 123-141.
Chih, H. K. (2008). Designing an online writing system: Learning with support. ELC Journal, 39(3), 285-299.
Constructivism Learning Theory. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.teach-nology.com/currenttrends/constructivism/
Davies, P., & Pearse, E. (2002). Success in English teaching. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press
Dubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (2002). Course design (p.174). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Geiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California. Oakland: University of California Office of the President. Retrieved 2002, March 1 from http://www.ucop.edu/sas/research/researchandplanning/pdf/sat study.pdf
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; London: Falmer Press.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp.3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kroeber & Kluckhohn. (1952). A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge Mass.
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer—Cross-linguistic Influence in language learning. Oxford: Cambridge University.
Scarcella, R.C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Scrivener, J. (2002). Learning teaching: A guidebook for English language teachers (p.159). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Wang, Z.Y. (1999). Language and culture (p.59). Higher Education Press.
Zhao, L. L. (2014). A study on metaphor and its differences between English and Chinese cultures. Canadian Social Science, 10(4), 101-105.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Higher Education of Social Science
Share us to: 
Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net，or hess@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures 
