A New Thought of Sports Law Based on Comparative Analysis
Abstract
In order to determine the reasonableness of the various theories of Sports law, to clarify the various relationships as for Sports Law and to form a more complete theoretical framework of Sports Law, this paper ventures to analyze the different points of view from different schools of theory, concept, nature and characteristics of Sports Law applying Comparative Analysis so as to redefine the concept of Sports law, and re-understand the nature and characteristics of Sports law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Gao, S. H. (2009). The disputes within China sports association legal relief. Journal of China Sport Science, (8), 39.
Gardiner, S. (2006). Sports law (p.9). Oregon: Cavendish Publishing.
Han, Y. (2006). Study on sports discipline. Beijing Sport University.
Michael, J., & Kerr, B. T. (1999). Marie demetrius. Sports Law, 3-7.
Robert, S. C., & Sideman, R. S. (2012). What is sports law: A reassessment of content and terminology. ASSER International Sports Law Series, (10), 18.
Tang, W. D. (2000). Sports law. China: Nanjing Normal University Press.
Woodhouse. (1996). Some reflections: Sport and the law (pp.13-16). Carolina Academic Press.
Zeng, Q. M. (1990). Dictionary of law (p.541). China: Shanghai Dictionary Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/5727
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net,or hess@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures