On Conflicts and Reconciliation Between Judicial Examination and Undergraduate Law Education

Jingxiang SU


The current judicial examination fully accords with the basic pattern of undergraduate law education in terms of the examination contents and subjects. However, the differences in the positioning of targets, content setting, appraisal approaches and other aspects between them as well as the inappropriate influences of universities’ excessive pursuit of the pass ratio of judicial examinations have resulted in the adverse effects on the undergraduate law education in the aspects of teaching contents, teaching methodologies and teaching orders. In order to reconcile the shocks on undergraduate law education imposed by the judicial examination, it is necessary to start from two aspects, respectively reforming the judicial examination’s contents and test methods as well as transforming the curriculum setting and teaching mode of undergraduate education.


Judicial examintion; Undergraduate law education; Conflict; Reconciliation

Full Text:



Huo, X. D. (2002). Key point in constructing and perfecting system of legal talent cultivation – On status and roles of judicial examination in legal talent cultivation. Law Review, (04).

Pan, J. F. (2003). A discussion on the relationship between judicial examination and undergraduate law education. Law Review, (02).

Pan, J. F., & Chen, H. P. (2008). Re-discussion on the relationship between law education and judicial examination. Journal of Law Application, (01).

Xiao, J. M. (2011). Exploration into China’s law education: Problems and measures. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (06).

Ye, Q. H., Han, D. Y., & Ding, X. S. (2003). Constructing positive interactions between law education and judicial examination. China Legal Science, (02).

Zhang, J. X. (2012). Reflections on full-time undergraduates’ participation into judicial examination. Social Scientist, (09).

Zhou, X., & Qi, W. Y. (2009). Reasonableness of law education guided by judicial examination. Law Science Magazine, (04).

Zhu, L. H. (2009). Reform of higher law education in process of legal governance (p.126). Beijing: Law Press China.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/5601


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)

Share us to:   


  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.

We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).


Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailcaooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures