Study on Chinese English Learners’ Acquisition of Wh-Movement Constraints

Xinyue ZHANG, Xiaona WU, Yujiao PAN

Abstract


This paper mainly investigates Chinese university students’ acquisition of constraints on English Wh-movement, with the aim of providing some evidence of the accessibility of universal grammar (UG) in second language acquisition (SLA). One UG principle, the Subjacency Principle, puts constraints on English Wh-movement and this is the major study point of the present study. The author selects a certain number of Chinese university students as participants and carries out a grammaticality judgment test. Since there does not involve Wh-movement in Chinese language, and Chinese students have no access to the Subjacency Principle during their daily studies, then if it happens that the subjects shows certain degree of obedience to this principle, a conclusion could be drawn that UG is still accessible and operative in SLA. Abroad, numerous linguistic researchers in the field of SLA have done studies concerning the Subjacency Principle, while in China, scarce similar studies have been made. The author firstly checks Chinese participants’ acceptance of grammatical long-distance Wh-movement and their rejection of ungrammatical Wh-movement with violations of the Subjacency principle, with the latter one as the major point. The discussion of the study is focused on the participant’s responses to varying degrees of Subjacency violations. The experimental results show that the Chinese subjects have demonstrated a certain degree of acceptance of the long-distance Wh-movement and of rejection of Subjacency violations. Therefore, the author concludes that UG is still available and operative in SLA,  while the extent to which it is accessible still requires to be further studied.


Keywords


Universal grammar; Subjacency principle; Accessibility; Wh-movement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S., & Ioup, G. (1988). The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, (4), 1 - 32.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge. Maa: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foils.

Clashen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners—The study of the acquisition of German and word order. Second Language Research, (2), 93-119.

Elaine, C. K., & Martohardjono, G. (1999). The development of second language grammars: A generative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Ellis, R. (1999). The study of SLA. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1986). SLA: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, (19), 677–714.

Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, (39), 215-58.

Martohardjono, G., & Gair, G. (1993). Apparent UG inaccessibility in SLA: Misapplied principles of principled misapplications? In F. Eckman (Ed.), Confluence: Linguistics, L2 acquisition, Speech pathology (pp.70-101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ouhalla, J. (2001). Introducing transformational grammar: From principles and parameters to minimalism. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Perez-Leroux, A. T., & Xiao, L. (1999). Selectivity in the acquisition of complex NP island. In E. C. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp.147-168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Radford, A. (2002). Syntactic theory and the structure of EnglishA minimalist approach. Beijing: Peking University Press.

Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a proposed universal. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on SLA (pp.73-88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schachter, J. (1990). On the issue of completeness in SLA. Second Language Research, (6), 93-1 24.

Schwartz, B. (1987). The modular basis of SLA. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Snatcher, J. (1988). SLA and its relationship to universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, (9), 219 - 235.

Virginia, Y. (1995). Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Vivan, C., & Newson, M. (2000). Chomsky’s universal grammar: An introduction. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

White, L. (1986). Implications of parametric variation for adult SLA: An investigation of the “pro-drop” parameter. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to SLA. Oxford: Pergamon.

White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and SLA. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.

White, L., & Juffs, A. (1998). Constraints on Wh-movement in two different contexts of normative language acquisition: competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O’. Neil (Eds.), The generative study of SLA. Mahwah (pp.111-129). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/5536

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)




Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada. 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailcaooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures