Worrying Political Democracy in 2024 National Elections on the Behavior of Election Managers
Abstract
Election organizers in Indonesia’s general elections are often accused of being an obstacle to the growth of democracy. The position of election administrators is a very serious problem for the growth of Indonesian democracy. The reason is very simple: Indonesia’s democracy failed during the New Order era which was supported by election administrators. The New Order was an opaque democracy for Indonesia’s democracy because election administrators were inseparable from the authoritarian regime. Even in the early days of reform, election management was very disappointing and became a source of new problems. When the election organizers namely the General Election Commission - KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) were asked to supervise their work by establishing the Election Supervisory Body – Bawaslu (Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum) in 2008 it was real evidence of poor performance that. The emergence of the third election organizing body, namely the Honorary Election Organizing Council - DKPP (Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum) is a sign that election administrators behave badly in building a dignified election process. The big concern is the difficulty of holding dignified general elections in the 2024 national simultaneous elections.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ashiddiqie, J. (2019). Presentation/Explanation of the DKPP Performance Report and the National Coordination Meeting of the Regional Examination Team (TPD) at the Mercure Ancol Hotel, North Jakarta, on Friday 18 December 2018 and Friday 20 December 2019.
Ashiddiqie, J. (2021, Dec.16,). Presentation and explanation of the DKPP Performance Report and the National Coordination Meeting of the Regional Examination Team (TPD) at the Mercure Harmoni Hotel, Central Jakarta, on Thursday.
Budiarjo, Miriam. II. Edition, revised set Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama 2010, p. 54. The case of the Election Organizer’s Code of Ethics Number 01-PKE-DKPP/1/2020 concerning the Dismissal of the Indonesian KPU Commissioner on behalf of Wahyu Setiawan.
Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (2nd ed., p.252). Floyd, Virginia: Impact Book. ISBN 9781617208652.
Case of the Code of Ethics for Election Organizers Number 1-DKPP-PKE/I/2012 Concerning the Case of the Chairperson of the DKI Jakarta Provincial KPU on behalf of Dahliah Umar.
Case of the Code of Ethics for Election Organizers Number 23-25-DKPP-PKE/I/2012 Regarding Dismissal from the positions of Secretary General and Deputy Secretary General of the Indonesian KPU and Return to Institutions of Origin on behalf of Suripto Bambang Setiadi, Asrudi Trijono et al.
Case of the Code of Ethics for Election Organizers Number 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019 concerning the Dismissal of the Indonesian KPU Commissioner on behalf of Evi Novida Ginting.
Case of the Election Organizer’s Code of Ethics Number 123-PKE-DKPP/X/2020 concerning the Dismissal of the Chairperson of the Indonesian KPU on behalf of Arief Budiman.
Dahl, R. A. (1956). An Introduction to Democratic Theory (pp.103-107). The University of Chicago Press.
Data from the DKPP of the Indonesian Experimental Ministry was received on Monday, January 31, 2022.
Diamonds, L., et al. (Ed.) (1989). Democracy in developing countries: Latin America, Volume Four (pp.ix+515). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner and London: Adamantine Press.
https://www.sindonews.com/, July 8, 2012, regarding an NGO’s rejection of DKPP’s ethical decisions.
Ida Budhiati’s testimony will be on Thursday, December 16, 2021, at the National Coordination Meeting of the Regional Examination Team (TPD) at the Mercure Harmoni Hotel, Jakarta.
In the search for democratic figures, philosophical studies Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. "Don't Sabotage Democracy," 11/10/2014, www.tempo.co.
Interview with Nur Hidayat Sardini, Chairman of the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia in 2008-2011 and Lecturer in Political Science at Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java
Magnis-Suseno, Franz, and Menuyu Democracy by Hendarmin Ranadireksa (2009). Media Focus, Bandung, p. 55
Participation and Opposition in Polyarchy Yale University Press, New Heaven (p.2). Data from the DKPP Complaints Office of the Republic of Indonesia was received on January 8, 2022.
Political and developing countries: comparing experience with democracy. Lynne Rienne, Boulder, Colorado, p. XVI, 6-7.
Samosir, Osbin (2017). Strong Christian political representation on a strong Islamic base Political Party Studies: PDI-P and the Golkar Party UKI Press, Jakarta.
Samosir, Osbin (2021). The system of political representation in modern times. UKI Press, Jakarta.
Samosir, Osbin (2022). Jakarta’s 21st Century Political Party: UKIPress. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (2014) [1942].
Wisnuwardhana University, Malang-East Java, p. 55LPPM EcoSosBudKum Journal Volume 3 Number 2 October 2016 Edition Franz Magnis-Suseno (1995).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12763
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net,or hess@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures