Eruption of the Submissive: A Study of Neurosis in Peter Shaffer’s Equus
Abstract
Peter Shaffer’s drama Equus has long been the subject of scholarly research, much of which centers on the psychological aspects of the work. However, none has directed the focus to a Freudian tripartite model of mind. On this basis, and in order to fill the gap in the literature on the topic, this article takes it upon itself to focus its attention on the psychological aspects in Equus, and tries to deliver a more comprehensive notion of the psychological flaws inherent in Alan Strang’s character. Based on the Freudian model of the mind composed of id, ego, and superego, this article analyzes the play in order to uncover the clues of Alan’s instability and abnormal personality in committing a horrible crime of blinding six horses with a hoof pick. Moreover, this study attempts to explain the impact of other characters’ behavioral patterns on Alan, while applying the same model. Methodologically, this study is divided into two different sections: contrary to the critics’ ideas that have associated the horses with either superego or the id, hereby it is argued that the horses can represent both, since Alan has mutated his sexual drives into religious fervor; in addition, Alan’s personality crisis is explained in terms of lack of ego formation which prevents him from creating a balance between the sense of guilt injected by the superego and the pulsing desires of the id that ultimately results in the dreadful crime of blinding the six horses. Lastly, this study moves to a discussion of the relationships between individuals and society, and explores how individuals are forced to conform to certain standards of behavior, since the resulting homogeneity contributes to the maintenance of society and its values.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blass, R. B. (2012). The ego according to Klein: Return to Freud and beyond. International
Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93(1), 151-66.
Buckley, T. (1975, April 13). Write me” said the play to Peter Shaffer. New York Times Magazine, 20-29.
Broadcasting and the arts. (1976, October 14). The Listener, 76-77.
Click, P. C. (1992). Technology and tragic conflict in Peter Shafer’s Equus and Walker Percy’s the thanatos syndrome. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 12, 10-16.
Dean, J. F. (1978). Peter Shaffer’s recurrent character type. Modern Drama, 21(3), 297-305.
de Oliveira Moreira, J. (2008). Otherness in interior identity: A reflection about the Freudian concepts of unconscious, superego, and id. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 689-701.
Ebner, I. D. (1982). The double crisis of sexuality and worship in Shaffer’s Equus. Christianity and Literature, 31(2), 29-47.
Equus playwright Peter Shaffer interprets its ritual. (1975, February). Vogue, pp.136-37, & 192.
Freud, S. (1953-74). J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud, (Vols. 10, 16, 17, 21, 22). London, England: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
Freud, S. (1960). The ego and the id (J. Riviere, Trans.; J. Strachey, Ed.). New York, NY:
W.W. Norton & Company.
Freud, S. (1962). Civilization and its discontents (J. Strachey, Trans. & Ed.). New York, NY:
W.W. Norton & Company.
Fromm, E. (1950). Psychoanalysis and religion. New York, NY: Yale University Press.
Gelb, B. (1965, November 14). And its author. New York Times, Sec. II, pp. 1, 2, 4.
George, T. D. (1999). The disruption of health: Shaffer, Foucault and ‘the normal’. Journal of Medical Humanities, 20(4), 231-245.
Gifford, S. (1974, December 15). Psychoanalyst says nay to Equus. New York Times, Sec. 2, p. 1.
Glenn, J. (1976). Alan Strang as an adolescent: a discussion of Peter Shafer’s Equus. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 5, 473-487.
Gottlieb, V. (1988). Thatcher’s theatre—or, after Equus. New Theatre Quarterly, 4(14), 99-104.
Gussow, M. (1974, October 24). Shaffer details a mind’s journey in Equus. New York Times, Sec. 1, p.50.
Hudson, K. A. (1978). Equus: A psychological interpretation based on myth (master’s thesis).
Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 1312836)
Kalson, A. E. (1973, December). Review of Equus. Educational Theatre Journal, 25(4), 514-515.
Kapustin, S. A. (2015). An existential criterion for normal and abnormal personality in the works
of Sigmund Freud and Alfred Adler. Psychology in Russia, 8(3), 4-17.
Kerr, W. (1974, November 3). Equus: A play that takes risks and emerges victorious. New York Times, Sec. 2, p. 1.
Klein, D. A. (1980). Literary onomastics in Peter Shaffer’s shrivings and Equus. Literary Onomastics Studies, 7, 127-138.
Lai, F. (1989). Peter Shaffer’s dramatic vision of the failure of society: A study of The Royal Hunt of the Sun, Equus and Amadeus (master’s thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations
& Theses Global. (Order No. MM59320)
Lounsberry, B. (1978). God-hunting: The chaos of worship in Peter Shaffer’s Equus and royal hunt of the sun. Modern Drama, 21(1), 13-28.
Lynch, W. (1975). What’s wrong with Equus? asks Euripides. America, 133(19), 419-22.
MacMurraugh-Kavanagh, M. K. (1998). Peter Shaffer: Theatre and drama. Basingstoke, United
Kingdom: Macmillan Press.
Marra, K. (2017). Equus and the production of queer historical memory. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 31(2), 33-53.
Montgomery, S. L. (2001). A case of (mis)taken identity? II: Freudian language in the ego and the id. Psychoanalytic Review, 88(1), 51-81.
Moreno, A. (1970). Jung, God, and modern man. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Neu, J. (Ed.). (1991). Cambridge companions to philosophy: The Cambridge companion to Freud. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Oller-Vallejo, J. (2006). Freudian agencies, psychic organs, and ego states. Transactional Analysis Journal, 36(1), 20-24.
Review: Arts: Passion play: Peter Shaffer’s startling play Equus, a study in repressed sexuality, was very much a product of the 1970s: Psychotherapist Adam Phillips celebrates its long overdue revival and its enduring emotional power. (2007). The Guardian.
Safak, Z. (2016). The relationship between Martin Dysart and Alan Strang in Peter Shaffer’s Equus in the light of psychoanalysis. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 30 (41), 109-128.
Shaffer, P. (2005). Equus. New York, NY: Scribner.
Sletvold, J. (2013). The ego and the id revisited: Freud and Damasio on the body ego/self.
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 94(5), 1019-1032.
Soleimani Ardekani, M. (1992). Peter Shaffer’s obsessional myths/religions Amadeus. Equus and Yonadab from a psychoanalytic point of view (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e862/15188efb1ea9cd41c90cec9414bdb5c583d6.pdf
Stock, M. T. (1961). Conscience and super-ego. A Speculative Quarterly Review, 24(2), 544.
Taylor, J. R. (1964). Shaffer and the Incas. Plays and Players, Apr. 12-13.
Vandenbroucke, R. (1975). Equus: Modern myth in the making. Drama and Theatre, XII (Spring), 129-133.
Wagner, P. C., Jr. (1989). The rational vs. the arational: Peter Shaffer’s divine trilogy
(master’s thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Watson, J. C. (1987). The ritual plays of Peter Shaffer (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Welsh, J. M. (1987). Dream doctors as healers in drama and film: A paradigm, an antecedent, and an imitation. Literature and Medicine, 6, 117-127.
Wolfe, G. (2010). Enjoying equus: Jouissance in Shaffer’s play. PSYART, 1-17.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11845
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Mahsa Sadat Razavi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net,or hess@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures