Representation Meaning of Multimodal Discourse in Textbooks: A Case Study of Persian Language-Learning Textbook

Habib Ahmadi, Saeed Yazdani, Zahra Babasalari, Ali Rabi

Abstract


Resources such as images, colors, sounds and actions have already been regarded as different types of modes which fulfill the meaning-making. Multimodal discourse refers to two or more modes working together for the meaning-making of the whole discourse. The paper conducts a multimodal discourse analysis of Persian language-learning textbook from ideational aspects. Persian language-learning textbooks give almost equal weight to both their pictures and verbal texts. The study of ideational aspect focuses on factors such as participants, processes (action, reactional, etc.), circumstance, etc. This article has a two-fold objective: (1) to discuss how the system of transitivity in Kress and van Leeuwen’s Visual Grammar (1996) for the analysis of images is related to the system of transitivity in Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar (2004) and (2) to investigate how multimodal texts combine in meaning production. In terms of a theoretical discussion about visual language, the study of Visual Grammar is relevant, considering the need for investigating the ways this kind of grammar can contribute for language teaching. The analysis reveals the pictures’ functions in meaning interpretation and explains the relations between the pictures and the verbal texts.


Keywords


Visual Grammar; multimodality; transitivity; Persian language-learning textbook

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, H., Yyazdani, S., Babasalari, S., & Rabi, A. (2018). The interaction of image and verbal text in a language-learning textbook. A multimodal and systemic functional. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr Branch.

Bakhtiari, S., & Saadat, M. (2015). Gender representation in interchange (3rd ed. series): A social semiotics analysis. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 18(2).

Désirée Motta-Roth. (2009). Transitivity in visual grammar: concepts and applications. Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, 12(2), 319-349, jul./dez.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.), London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Correlation in English: London: Longman.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.

Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.) London: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T.V. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication.

Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in Hyper modality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299-325.

Lim, F.V. (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic model. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London and New York: Continuum.

Liu, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Inter-semiotic Texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19(4), 367-388.

Martinec, R. (1998). Correlation in action. Semiotica, 120(1/2), 161-180.

Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media. Visual communication, 4(3), 337-371.

Nikolajeva, M., & Scott, C. (2000). The dynamics of picture book communication. Children’s Literature in Education, 31(4), 225-239.

Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. University of Georgia Press.

O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. Continuum.

O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SFMDA): constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication (Vol.7, pp.443-475).

Roohani, A., & Saeidfar, A. (2013).A critical evaluation of visual elements in Iranian junior high school English textbooks. Journal of Faculty of Letter and Humanities, 8(28), 80-96.

Royce, T. (1998). Synergy on the page: Exploring inter-semiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text. JASFL Occasional Papers, 1(1), 25-49.

Royce, T. (2007). Inter-semiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp.63-109).

Saffar Moqaddam, A. (1391). Persian language-learning textbook series. Persian Language Development Council Press.

Sahragard, R., & Davatgarzadeh, G. (2010). The representation of social actors in Interchange (3rd ed. series): A critical discourse analysis. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2(1), 67-89.

Spencer, M. L. (1924). Editorial writing: Ethics, policy, practice. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Stockdale, D. A. (2006). Gender representation in an EFL textbook. Master’s thesis, University of Birmingham, UK. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cels.bham.ac.uk/resources /essays / DAStockdaleSociolinguistics.pdf

Tahririan, M. H., & Sadri, E. (2013). Analysis of images in Iranian high school EFL course books. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 16(2), 137-160

Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10959

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Habib Ahmadi, Saeed Yazdani, Zahra Babasalari, Ali Rabi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


 

Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net,or  hess@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


 


 Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailcaooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures