Visual Thinking: An Attempt at Dissecting Visual Aesthetics
Abstract
In Art Education, reading and understanding artworks and designs through a direct process of structural analysis improve visual thinking and performance, especially at the foundation level. This paper examines ways in which the learning process takes place. It argues that mathematical relations and geometry are underlying constitutes in artworks. The analytical process enhances the learners’ cognition, perception, and their acquisition of visual and iterative skills that can significantly affect their development. Accordingly, it considers the mechanisms of the analysis and their educational value, as these may solicit novel rereadings of the artworks and their aesthetics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(3), 152-153.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon (Abridged Edition).
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press (expanded and revised edition of the 1954 original),.
Barrett, T. (1994). Criticizing art: understanding the contemporary. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Baxandall, M. (1972). Painting and Experience in the Fifteen Century Italy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, B. S., Krathwohl, D. R., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Classification of educational goals. Handbook 2: affective domain. Boston: David McKay Company, Inc..
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: Longman, Green & Co..
Cassirer, Er. (1963). The individual and the cosmos in renaissance philosophy (M. Domandi, Trans.). New York: Harper.
Delacroix. E. (1972). The Journal of Eugene Delacroix (W. Pach, Trans.). New York: Viking Press (A Viking compass book, C335).
Field, M. J. (2000). Mathematics through art–art through mathematics. In D. Salesin and C. Séquin (Eds.), Proc. MOSAIC 2000 (pp.137-146). University of Washington.
Grabiner, J. V. (2011, Jan.). How to teach your own liberal arts mathematics course. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 1(1).
Grunbaum, B., & Shephard, G. C. (1985). Handbook of applicable mathematics. In W. Ledermann and S. Vajda (Eds.), Combinatorics and Geometry (Vol.V). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hankins, T. L., & Silverman, R. J. (1995). Instruments and the imagination. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
James, W. (1987). Essays, comments, and reviews. London: Harvard University Press.
Koenderink, J. (2013). Part & whole. Utrecht, Netherlands: De Clootcrans Press.
Lecanides-Arnott, M. (2014, Feb.). Drawing as learning to see: A strategy to locate the ‘White/Open Space’, That encourages intuitive thinking in designers. Studies in Material Thinking, 10, The Art of Research, Paper 04.
Mueller, I. (2005). Mathematics and the divine in Plato. In T. Koetsier and L. Bergmans (Eds.), Mathematics and the divine: A historical study (Chapter 4). IL: The University of Chicago.
Plato. (2004). Republic (C.D.C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Rawes, P. (2008). Space; geometry and aesthetics: Through Kant and Towards Deleuze. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Samara, T. (2012). Drawing for graphic design: Understanding conceptual principles and practical techniques to create unique, effective design solutions. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
Schattschneider, D. (2003, April). Mathematics and art - So many connections. Math awareness month. Retrieved from: http://www.ams.org/publicoutreach/msamhome/03-essay3.htm
Smith, P. H. (2004). The body of the artisan: Art and experience in the scientific revolution. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Srouji, H. (2017). A Methodology of Teaching Fundamentals of Art and Design. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 5(4), (ISSN: 2321 - 2454).
Summers, D. (1987). The judgment of sense: Renaissance naturalism and the rise of aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tenen, L. (2011). The value of mathematics within the ‘Republic’. Res Cogitans, 2(1), Article 22.y K.
Washburn, D. K. (1983). Towards a theory of structural style in art. Structure and cognition in art (Chapter 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10946
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Hanibal Charles Srouji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net，or hess@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures 
