Comparative Study on Administrative Subject Types
Abstract
This paper studies the situation and defects of China’s modern administrative subject types through comparative analysis on the administrative subject types of continental law system and Anglo-American law system countries, analyzes the necessity and applicability of constructing multiple administrative subject system in China, and also provides several innovations for the construction of Chinese administrative subject system from the perspective of China’s legal culture characteristics and adaptability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carol, H., & Richard, R. (1997). Law and administration.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Habermas, J. (1999). Structural transformation of public domain (W. D. Cao, et al. Trans.). Beijing: Akademia Press.
Hou, J. R. (2002). Discussion on administrative subject theory. Contemporary Law Review, (8).
Hu, J. M. (1998). Administrative law. Beijing: Law Press China.
Ian, L. (2002). Taking proportionately: Judicial review, the human rights act and Strasburg. Public Law Summer, 47.
Jiang, M. A. (1999). Administrative law and administrative litigation law. Beijing: Peking University Press & Higher Education Press.
Li, X. (2001). Theoretical analysis on modern administrative subject diversification. Administrative Law Review, 6.
Li, Z. S. et al. (1993). Contemporary public law theory—Proceedings of Professor Weng Yuesheng 60th Birthday Congratulation Conference. Taiwan: Yuanzhao Publishing House.
Ma, H. D. (2000). Public legal person studies. China Legal Science, (4).
Maurer, H. (2000). General theory of administrative law. Beijing: Law Press China.
Mayer, O. (2002). German administrative law (F. Liu, Trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Shen, K. (2000). The application and boundary issue of expanding administrative law—tentative thinking on Tian Yong v. Beijing University of Science and Technology case. Administrative Law Review, 3.
Shi, Y. Q. (2003). Public administration development and administrative subject diversification. Tribune of Political Science and Law (Journal of China University of Political Science and Law), (6), 33.
Shiono, H. (1999). Administrative law (J. S. Yang, Trans.). Beijing: Law Press China.
Tu, Y. M. (2002). Several considerations on perfecting chinese administrative subject theory. Journal of Jiangxi Administration Institute, 4(3), 56.
Wang, M. Y. (1987). British administrative law. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Wang, M. Y. (1988). French administrative law. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Wang, X. D. (2003). Historical review on the re-definition of chinese administrative subject. Contemporary Law Review, (3).
Weng, Y. S. (2009). Administrative law. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.
Yang, J. S. (1998). Introduction to Japanese administrative law. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.
Ying, S. N. (1998). Administrative law new theory. Beijing: China Fangzheng Press.
Zhang, S. Y. (2000). On administrative subject. Tribune of Political Science and Law (Journal of China University of Political Science and Law), (4).
Zhang, S. Y. (2000). Studies on administrative subject. China Legal Science, (2).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/2729
DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/g6090
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Share us to: 
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to flr@cscanada.net，or flr@cscanada.org for consideration.
We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Frontiers of Legal Research are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Frontiers of Legal Research Editorial office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
E-mail: flr@cscanada.net; flr@cscanada.org; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
