Cross-Cultural Communication
The Reform of the Judicial Committee in China
Abstract
The reform of the judicial power is the focus in judicial reform. As localized Committee, it has the de facto supreme judicial jurisdiction in court operations, which play the function of summing up trial experience and strengthening the important functions of trial democracy and trial supervision. And its abolition has become an important measure of judicial modernization and a way out under the background of judicial reform. This article considers the value of the Judicial Committee from the view of both advantages and disadvantages, and improves the relevant system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chen, R. H. (1999). Mistaken sense of justice. In S. G. Qiang & Q. P. Kong (Eds.), Law review of Peking university (first volumes) (p.2). Beijing: Law Press.
Ehrlich, P. (2009). Principles of legal sociology. Encyclopedia of China Press
He, W. F. (1999). Several comments on the Judicial Committee. In S. G. Qiang & Q. P. Kong (Eds.), Law review of Peking university (first volumes) (p.2).Beijing: Law Press.
Jiang, H. L. (1998). On the central theory of judge．People’s Justice, (6).
Song, B. (1999). The judicial system and judicial process of the United States and Germany (p.178). Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Song, B. (Ed.). (1998). Procedures, justice and modernization—foreign jurists in China speech (p.61). Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Su, L. (1999). Review and reflection on the judicial committee of grass roots courts. In S. G. Qiang & Q. P. Kong (Eds.), Law review of Peking university (first volumes) (p.2). Beijing: Law Press.
Tan, S. G. (1999). On judicial independence and media’s supervision. China Legal Science, (4).
Wang, L. M., & Yao, H. (1998). Study on the establishment of the people’s court and the reform of the trial methods (Part I).China Legal Science, (2).
Wang, H. A. (1999). Probe into the reform of court system. People’s Judicature, (6).
Wang, L. M. (2016). Disciplinary system of judges. Retrieved from http://www.lawtime.cn/info/lunwen/sifazd/2007012260890_3.html
Wang, M. Y. (2007). French administrative law (pp.556-557). Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Xiong, Q. H. (1999). Judicial justice and citizen participation. Jurisprudential Study, (4).
Xue, A. P., & Yao, X. B. (19990). From supervision to restriction. The Science of Law, (9).
Xue, W. Q. (2002). It is imperative to abolish the Judicial Committee. Journal of Fuyang Normal College (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), (2).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9734
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Qun LIU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Remind
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net，or ccc@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
