Implementing a Group- and Project/Problem-Based Learning in a College Algebra Course

Abdramane Serme


The idea of this paper originated from reading the interesting article written by Mohammad A. Alseweed in Studies in Literature and Language (2013). In the article, the author defined and analyzed traditional learning, blended/hybrid learning and virtual learning. The result favored blended/hybrid learning in test scores and students’ attitudes suggests that students are more receptive when instructors use different teaching approaches. In this paper we describe an innovative approach to project-based learning in a group setting environment. Traditional science instruction has tended to exclude students who need to learn from contexts that are real-world, graspable, and self-evidence meaningful (Kolodner et al., 2003). As emphasized by Blumenfeld, one way of encouraging student engagement and addressing the contextualization of students’ inquiry is through project-based instruction (Bumenfeld et al., 1991; Petrosino, 2004). The learning sciences community agrees that deep and effective learning is best promoted by situating learning in purposeful and engaging activity (Bransford et al., 1999; Collins et al., 1989; Kolodner et al., 2003). Our goal for developing this collaborative project/problem-based learning technique is to engage the students in deep learning by encouraging them to write and explain all the steps of their reasoning when yielding to the answers.


Project-based learning; Problem-based learning; Collaborative learning; Group-based learning; Collaborative project/group-based learning; Introductory Algebra; Teaching College Algebra

Full Text:



Alseweed, M. (2013). Students’ achievement and attitude toward using traditional learning, blended learning, and virtual classes learning in teaching and learning at the university level. Studies in Literature and Language, 6(1), 65-73.

Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271-311.

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Byrne, M. (2013). Learning to cooperate: One researcher’s experiences building effective cooperative groups with students. Abstracts of American Mathematical Society, 34(1), Issue 171, p.532.

Collins, A., Brown, S., & Newman, G., (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 453-494.

Dahlgren, M., & Ӧberg, G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education, 41(3), 263-282.

Hancock, D. (2004). Cooperative learning and peer orientation effects on monitoring and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 159-166

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education: Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287-314.

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., … Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12-21.

Kolodner, J., Camp, P., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by designtm into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.

Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73-86.

Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Mills, K. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 517-538.

Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 442-359.

Meyer, D., Turner, J., & Spencer, C. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning. The Elementary School Journal, 97(5), 501-521.

Petrosino, A. (2004). Integrating curriculum, instruction, and assessment in project-based instruction: A case study of an experienced teacher. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(4), 447-460.

Prescott, J., & Smith, D. (1987). A project-based approach to competitive analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), 411-423.

Toolin, R. (2004). Striking a balance between innovation and standards: A study of teachers implementing project-based approaches to teaching science”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13 (2), 179-187.

Williams, T. (2003). Learning from projects. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(5), 443-451.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)

Share us to:   


If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".

We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:;;

 Articles published in Studies in Mathematical Sciences are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).


Address: 9375 Rue de Roissy Brossard, Québec, J4X 3A1, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures