Management Science and Engineering
The Research on Impact Factors of Perceived Online Review Usefulness
Abstract
Online review has become a research focus of marketing researchers recently, especially on its impacting on consumers’ purchasing decision. But considering the questionnaire research method and ignorance of influencing mechanism research, this study is established to study the detail impact factors of online reviews of usefulness. The study uses text mining method to collect valid data on Yelp.com, the biggest online review platform over the world. Results indicate that online reviews depth, review humor marked by other users, reviewers’ historic comments amount, reviewers’ rank, reviewers’ centrality of social network and others’ responds all have significant impact on the perceived online reviews usefulness. And the product involvement of review receiver plays moderating role in influencing the content of information and sources of information on the perceived online reviews usefulness.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., & Sia, C. L., et al. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9-38.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
Fan, X. P. (2009). The motivation to pariticipate untrading virtual community: emprical research and management predictions. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, (1), 1-6.
Gilly, M. C., Graham, J. L., Wolfinbarger, M. F., et al. (1998). A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 83-100.
Godes, D. M. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545-560.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological theory, 1(1), 201-233.
Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 4(1), 60-75.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Walsh, G., et al. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-
52.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change [J].
Kuenzel, J., & Musters, P. (2007). Social interaction and low involvement products. Journal of Business Research, 60(8), 876–883.
Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A. M., Mueller, A. M., Hehli, D. J., & Wegener, A. A. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251–261.
Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125-148.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of consumer research, 10(2), 135.
Pitta, D. A., & Fowler, D. (2005) . Internet community forums: an untapped resource for consumer marketers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(5), 265-274.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological bulletin, 105(1), 131.
Sun, T., Youn, S., & Wu, G., et al. (2006). Online Word‐of‐Mouth (or Mouse): An Exploration of Its Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1104-1127.
Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47-65.
Thibaut, J. W., & Riecken, H. W. (1955). Some determinants and consequences of the perception of social causality. Journal of Personality, 24(2), 113-133.
Wen, Z. L., Hou, J. T., & Zhang, L. (2005). The research and comparision between moderating and mediating effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(2), 268-274.
Wiertz, C., & de Ruyter, K. (2007). Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization studies, 28(3), 347-376.
Yin, G. P. (2012). Which kind of online review works better — the influence of social network factors. Management World, (12), 115-124.
Zhang, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Responses to humorous ads. Does audience involvement matter? Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 113–127.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/6496
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Share us to: 
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to mse@cscanada.net，or mse@cscanada.org for consideration.
We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; mse@cscanada.net; mse@cscanada.org
Articles published in Management Science and Engineering are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Editorial Office
Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures 
