A Comparison of Occupational Skill Appraisal Mechanism Between Mainland and Taiwan in China

Mijia LUO, Changfa XIE

Abstract


Occupational skill appraisal is a kind of assessment based on occupational skills. A perfect mechanism of Occupational Skill Appraisal can bring its superiority into full play in social economy. The study is aiming at a comparison of three mechanisms between mainland and Taiwan in China. They are respectively the mechanism of power dustribution among governments, the mechanism of application and that of selection among contractors. Besides, The reflection of current situations on occupational skill appraisal in Chinese mainland appeal for further improvement in the distribution of authority among central and local goverments, regulation of employment admittance as well as the cooperation between goverment and society.


Keywords


Occupational skill appraisal; Mechanism; Goverment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cao, W. M. (2008). The functions of government (pp.102-103). Beijing: People Press.

Cheng, S.(1997). Evaluation on occupational skill appraisal and vocational certificate system. Vocational Education Forum, 5(5), 42.

Li, H. W. (2012). Resons of difficulty in rectifying professional qualification certificate system and the perfecting strategies in China. Vocational and Techinical Education, 3(7), 47-48.

Tang, J. (2006). The governance of government (p.410). China Social Science Press.

Yang, L. A. (2008). Comparion study on relation between non-goverment organizations and goverments: Taking Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore for examples.

Yu, D. H. (2007). On the harmonious borderline between goverment and market and its administrative route. Journal of Xian Yang Normal University, 12(6),79-80.

Zhu, Z. M .(2005). Mechanism of policy coordination between central and rigional goverments. Administration in china, (7), 134-135.

Chongqing Human Resources and Social Security Network. (2014, June 1). Notice about printing “examination management on occupational skill appraisal in Chongqing”. Retrieved from http://www.cqosta.org.cn/newsinfo_id-2658_cid-248_fid-139.htm




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/6133

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/g6806

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Share us to:   

Reminder

  • We are currently accepting submissions via email only. 

  • The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

  •  Please send your manuscripts to flr@cscanada.net，or  flr@cscanada.org  for consideration.

  •  We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Frontiers of Legal Research are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

Frontiers of Legal Research Editorial office  

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
E-mail: flr@cscanada.net; flr@cscanada.org; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture