Corsets, Headpieces, and Tape: An Ethnography of Gendered Performance

Rachel B. Friedman, Adam Jones


Drag queens co-construct their identities in order to become part of one segment of the gay community referred to as the drag queen community. We argue that to act in the identity of a drag queen is to maximize the contrast with ascribed gender identity and minimize the distortion thereof. We adapted Tajifel and Turner’s (1979) Social Identity Theory to provide us with the necessary framework, but we built upon Goffman’s dramaturgical metaphor and Carbaugh’s ideas on social identification. We conducted several interviews with the different performers before and after the drag shows over several weeks. As part of our findings, in order for the drag queens to communicatively create their group identity, there is a certain degree of behavior and attitude conformity. There is an importance placed upon the likeness or dependence/reliance on one another (i.e. a sense of community), and last, there is internalization of these behaviors, exerted both individually and collectively. This helps to solidify their sense of community and belonging through ritualistic behaviors and allows the individuals to gain a better understanding of who they are personally and socially through this membership.
Key words: Social Identification; Gender Identity; Drag Queen Culture

Resumé: Les drag queens co-construisent leurs identités pour devenir partie d'un segment de la communauté homosexuelle appelée la communauté des drag queens. Nous affirmons qu'agir dans l'identité de drag queen est de maximiser le contraste avec l'identité de genre attribué et minimiser la distorsion de celle-ci. Nous avons adapté la théorie de l'identité sociale de Tajifel et Turner (1979) afin de nous fournir un cadre nécessaire, mais nous avons construit la métaphore dramaturgique de Goffman et les idées sur l'identification sociale de Carbaugh. Nous avons mené plusieurs entretiens avec de différents artistes avant et après les spectacles sur plusieurs semaines. En tant qu'une partie de nos résultats, nous avons trouvé que pour que les drag queens puissent créer leur identité de groupe, il y a un certain degré de comportement et d'attitude de conformité. Il y a une importance accordée à la ressemblance ou la dépendance/confiance entre les uns les autres (c'est à dire un sentiment de communauté), et enfin, il y a une internalisation de ces comportements, exercés à la fois individuellement et collectivement. Cela contribue à solidifier leur sentiment de communauté et d'appartenance à travers des comportements rituels et permet aux individus de mieux comprendre qui sont-ils personnellement et socialement par le biais de cette adhésion.
Mots-clés: Identification Sociale; Identité de Genre; Culture de Drag Queen


Social Identification; Gender Identity; Drag Queen Culture;Identification Sociale; Identité de Genre; Culture de Drag Queen


Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Basso, K. (1999). Portraits of “The whiteman” Linguistic play and cultural symbols among the Western Apache. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.

Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.

Burke, K. (1968). Dramatism. In Sills, D. L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 445-447). New York, NY: Crowell Collier and Macmillan, Inc..

Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Carbaugh, D. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in american scenes. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc..

Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (Eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

LeCompte, M.D. & Goetz, J.P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.

Morton, T & Duck, J. (2000). Social identity and media dependency in the gay community. Communication Research, 27, 438-461.

Philipsen, G. (1992). Speaking Culturally: Explorations in social communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press

Tajifel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Wieder, D. L. & Pratt, S. (1990). On being a recognizable Indian among Indians. In D. Carbaugh, (ed). Cultural and Intercultural Contact, (pp.45-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.



  • There are currently no refbacks.


If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".

We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:;;;

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture (CAOOC)
Address:758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://; Http://;