The Study of Content Validation on CET Writing Section After Reform in China

Lili ZHAI, Xiaorui LI

Abstract


The College English Test (CET) hosted by China Ministry of Education in 1987 is a large-scale standardized test, divided into CET-4 and CET-6. There are two times one year. CET-4 is for the basic requirement, while CET-6 is for higher requirement. CET is the largest exam of English in China. Since the 1980s, more and more people have focused on it, for it has a profound influence on English teaching. In order to test students’ English level, improve the quality of English teaching and meet the requirement of social development, CET conducted two reforms in 2006 and 2012 respectively. The present paper based on the college English test from 2012 to 2015 has chosen 42 sets of writing paper as the research object, and studied content validation of the writing section after reform from two aspects, design of test and content of test, aiming at examining the quality of writing part of the thesis. The results show that genre tends to be diversified; the topics are rich; the principles of openness and authenticity have been adopted appropriately; the rubrics of the writing items contain adequate information. The results also show that the subject matter of the CET writing covers a wide range, which has grasped the principle of authenticity well; openness is moderate; prompted information is sufficient; forms of prompted information are no longer model. However, genre of CET writing questions is limited to argumentation, and interaction is less. Based on these results, this paper puts forward some suggestions for future improvement in design of CET writing test items and for English writing teaching.


Keywords


CET; Writing test items; Design of test; Content of test; Validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cai, J. G. (2002). Influence of CET writing requirements and scoring criteria on chinese studens’ compositions. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (5), 49-53

Gu, X. D. (2004). Review of the washback effect in the past ten years: Problems & tendency. Foreign Language Studies, (4), 69-89, 115.

Gu, X. D. (2007). Positive or negative? —An empirical study of CET washback. Chongqing, China: Chongqing University Press.

Hughes, A. (2000). Testing for language teachers. Beijing: Foreign Languages Teaching and Research Press.

Li, Q. H. (2000). On the characteristics and essence of communicative language testing. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, (3), 67-71.

Li, X. J. (1997). The science and art of language testing. Changsha, China: Hunan Education Press.

Liu, R. Q., & Han, B. C. (2000). Language testing and its methods. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Si, X. Z., & Lu, J. S., et al. (2006). English writing. Shanghai: Donghua University Press.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.

Yang, H. Z., & Weir, C. (1998). Research on validity of CET. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Teaching Press.

Yang, H. Z. (1998). Review and prospect of college English test. Foreign Language World.(3), 27-31.

Yang, H. Z. (1999). Language testing and language teaching. Foreign Language World, (1), 16-25.

Yang, H. Z. (2003). Review of CET in fifteen years. Foreign Language World, (3), 21-29.

You, X. (2014). The choice made from no choice: English writing instruction in a Chinese university. Journal of Second Language Writing, (13).

Zou, S. (2005). Language testing. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9646

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Lili ZHAI, Xiaorui Li

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Remind

We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net,or  ccc@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture