“I Would I Had No Tongue, No Ears”: Oral, Aural and Sexual Openness in Heywood’s A Woman Killed With Kindness

Bilal Tawfiq Hamamra

Abstract


Following historicist and materialist feminist criticisms, material food studies and the cultural attitudes towards food and female speech and hearing in early modern England, I argue that Thomas Heywood’s A Woman Killed with Kindness (1607) dramatises the interrelatedness of oral, aural and sexual appetites. I contend that Anne’s oral, aural and sexual openness to Wendoll is a complex form of subversive complicity; she subverts the authority of her husband while obeying him in submitting aurally and sexually to Wendoll whom Frankford invites to use his table and unconsciously his wife. I argue that Heywood perceived appetite as an instrument for revenge, penitence, and redemption. While Anne’s aural and oral openness to Wendoll’s seductive speech leads to her sexual openness, I explain that her self-imposed punishment of self-starvation is an oral revenge in which she consumes the flesh that has bred her sin. I argue that Anne’s starvation is an act of political resistance against a patriarchal society that uses food and eating as forms of control.

 


Keywords


Food; Appetite; Oral and aural openness; Adultery; Starvation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Appelbaum, R. (2006). Aguecheek’s beef, belch’s hiccup, and other gastronomic interjections: literature, culture, and food among the early moderns. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bakhtin, M. (1968). Rabelais and his world (H. Isowolsky, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT.

Bennett, L. (2000). The homosocial economies of a woman killed with kindness. Renaissance and Reformation, 24(2), 35-61.

Bowers, R. (1984). A woman killed with kindness: Plausibility on a smaller scale. Studies in English Literature, 24(2), 293-306.

Brathwait, R. (1631). The English gentlewoman. London: Theatrum Orbis Terranum Ltd.

Bryan, M. B. (1974). Food symbolism in a woman killed with kindness. Renaissance Papers, 9-17.

Bynum, C. W. (1987). Holy feast and holy fast: The religious significance of food to medieval women. California: University of California Press.

Callaghan, D. (1989). Women and gender in renaissance tragedy: A study of king lear, othello, the duchess of malfi and the white devil. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

Christina L. (2002). A moving Rhetoricke: Gender and silence in early modern England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Comensoli, V. (1996). “Household business”: Domestic plays of early modern England. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.

Dolan, E. (2008). Marriage and violence: the early modern legacy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Findlay, A. (1999). A feminist perspective on renaissance drama. Oxford: Blackwell.

Frey, C., & Lieblen, L. (2004). “My breast sear’d”: The self-starved female body and a woman killed with kindness. Early Theatre, 7(1), 45-66.

Green, R. (2005). Open ears, appetite, and adultery in a woman killed with kindness. English Studies in Canada, 31(4), 53-74

Gutierrez, N. A. (2003). Shall she famish then? Female food refusal in early modern England. Burlington: Ashgate.

Heywood, T. (1961). A woman killed with kindness. In F. R.W. Van (Ed.). London: Methuen and Co Ltd.

Keeble, N. H. (Ed.). (1994). The cultural identity of seventeenth - century woman: A reader. London and New York: Routledge.

Kilgour, M. (1990). From communion to cannibalism: An anatomy of metaphors of incorporation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mcquade, P. (2000). “A labyrinth of sin”: Marriage and moral capacity in Thomas Heywood’s a woman killed with kindness. Modern Philology, 98, 231-250.

Newman, K. (1991). Fashioning femininity and English renaissance drama. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Panek, J. (1994). Punishing adultery in a woman killed with kindness. Studies in English Literature, 34(2), 357-78.

Richardson, C. (2006). Domestic life and domestic tragedy in early modern England: The material life of the household. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

Sawday, J. (1995). The body emblazoned: Dissection and the human body in renaissance culture. London: Routhledge.

Stallybrass, P. (1986). Patriarchal territories: The body enclosed. In M. Ferguson, M. Quilligan & N. J. Vickers (Eds.), Rewriting the renaissance: The discourses of sexual difference in early modern Europe (pp.123-42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Vandereycken, W., & Deth, R. V. (1994). From Fasting saints to anorexic girls: The history of self-starvation. London: The Athlone Press.

Wall, W. (2002). Staging domesticity: Household work and English identity in early modern drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Woodbridge, L. (1994). The scythe of Saturn, Shakespeare and magical thinking. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8772

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Bilal Tawfiq Hamamra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Remind

We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net,or  ccc@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture