University Student Perception of Teacher Confirmation as Perceived by Instructors at the Faculty of Educational Science at the Hashemite University

Ahmad M. Mahasneh

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine university students’ perceptions of teacher confirmation in the Hashemite University in Jordan. A total of 258 students participated in the study, completing the Teacher Confirmation Scale (TCS). Results indicated the means for the first dimension: teacher response to questions, as 3.58, the means for the second dimension: demonstrating interest, as 3.62, and the means for the third dimension: teaching style, as 3.48. Findings also revealed that there were statistically significant differences between male and female students’ perceptions regarding the teacher response questions, and also indicated significant differences among the four academic level groups regarding the teaching styles, as well as significant differences among the four GPA level groups regarding teacher demonstration of interest.

Keywords


University student; Student perceptions; Teacher confirmation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, J. L., O’Mara, J., & Judd, B. (1985). The relationship of communication anxiety, avoidance and competence of non-native English speakers in the U.S. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Honolulu, HI.

Allen, J. L., O’Mara, J., & Long, K. M. (1987). Communication competence anxiety, avoidance behaviors, and the classroom experience of nonnative English speaker in the U.S. Paper presented to the Commission on Communication Apprehension and Avoidance at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.

Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (1986). How people disqualify: Experimental studies of spontaneous written communication. Communication Monographs, 53, 71-74.

Beatty, M. J., & Dobbs, J. A. (1992). Relationship between sons’ perceptions of fathers’ messages and satisfaction in adult son-father relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 277-284.

Beatty, M., & Dobos, J. (1993). Adult males’ perceptions of confirmation and relational partner communication apprehension: Indirect effects of fathers on sons’ partners. Communication Quarterly, 41, 66-76.

Booth-Butterfield, S. (1992). Influence and control in the classroom. Edina, MN: Burgess.

Buber, M. (1957). Distance and relation. Psychiatry, 20, 97-104.

Cissna, K. N., & Keating, S. (1979). Speech communication antecedents of perceived confirmation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 43, 48-90.

Cissna, K. N., & Sieburg, E. (1995). Patterns of interactional confirmation and disconfirmation. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication (6th ed., pp.237-246). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Clarke, F. P. (1973). International communication variables as predictors of marital satisfaction-attraction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Denver.

Cook, M. N. (1980). Communication confirmation and interpersonal satisfaction of mothers and their adolescent sons (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Denver.

Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264-291.

Ellis, K. (2002). Perceived parental confirmation: Development and validation of an instrument. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 319-334.

Ellis, K. (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53, 1-20. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742

Friedman, M. (1983). The confirmation of otherness in family, community, and society. New York: Pilgrim.

Gabriel, S. L., & Smithson, I. (1990). Gender in the classroom: Power and pedagogy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Garrison, J. P., & Garrison, K. R. (1979). Measurement of oral communication apprehension among children: A factor in the development of basic speech skills. Communication Education, 28, 119-128.

Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153-179.

Keating, S. (1977). The effects of agreement, disagreement, facilitative communication, and self disclosure on the perceived confirmation of males and females (Unpublished master’s final research project). St. Louis University.

Krupnick, C. G. (1985). Women and men in the classroom: Inequality and its remedies on teaching and learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 71-87.

Laing, R. D. (1961). The self and others. New York: Pantheon.

Leth, P. (1977). Self-concept and interpersonal response in a classroom: An exploratory study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University.

Myers, S. A. (2006). Using leader-member exchange theory to explain students’ motives to communicate. Communication Quarterly, 54, 293-304.

Myers, S. A., & Bryant, L. E. (2002). Perceived understanding, interaction involvement and college student outcomes. Communication Research Reports, 19, 146-155.

Schrodt, P., Turman, P. D., & Soliz, J. (2006). Perceived understanding as a mediator of perceived teacher confirmation and students ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 55, 370-388. doi:10.1080/03634520600879196

Sieburg, E. (1973). Interpersonal confirmation: Conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.

Sieburg, E. (1985). Family communication: An integrated systems approach. New York: Gardner Press.

Spender, D. (1989). Invisible women: The schooling scandal. London: Women’s Press.

Sundell, W. (1972). The operation of confirming and disconfirming verbal behavior in selected teacher-student interactions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Denver.

Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1-9.

Turman, P. D., & Schrodt, P. (2006).Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265-279. doi:10.1080/ 03634520600702570

Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, B. J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Wood, J. T. (2003). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Ahmad M. Mahasneh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada. 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture