Cross-Cultural Communication
Intercultural Issues in Teaching English Discussion to Taiwanese Students
Abstract
This paper examines the difficulties facing the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teacher of English Language majors in Taiwanese universities. As EFL skills classes are often taught independently (i.e. listening, speaking etc.), rather than as integrated skills class teachers of high intermediate and advanced speaking classes are faced with the challenge of providing classroom practices and activities that will allow students to meaningfully engage and fulfill their educational goals.
Social practices, including education, are variable between cultures. Hence, cultural differences mean that some methodologies and activities advocated by EFL researchers and practitioners fail to resonate with Taiwanese students. Differences between pedagogic methodologies and practices in East Asia and those in Western countries mean that there are potential barriers to incorporating discussion and debate activities into the EFL classroom in Asia. The paper will then outline a program of student empowerment used in class.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Christensen, C. R. (1991) Premises and practices of discussion teaching. In D. A. Garvin, A. Sweet, & C. R. Christensen (Eds.), Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership (pp.15-36). Boston. Harvard Business School Press.
Ellis, G. (1996). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT Journal. 50(3), 213-218.
Green, C. F. (1993) Learner drives in second language acquisition. English Teaching Forum, 31(1), 2-11.
Green, C.F., Christopher, E. R., & Lam, J. (2002). Developing Discussion Skills in the ESL Classroom. In J. Richards (Ed.), Methodology in Language Teaching (pp.225-234). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperez, J. J. (1982). Language and Social Identity. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Ho, D. Y. F., Peng, S. Q., & Chan, S. F. (2002a). Authority and learning in Confucian-heritage education: A relational methodological analysis. In F. Salili, C. Y. Chiu and Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), Multiple competencies and self-regulated learning: Implications for multicultural education (pp.29-47). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing,
Ho, D. Y. F., Peng, S. Q., & Chan, S. F. (2002b). Chinese societies. In F. An investigative research in teaching andlearning in Salili. In C. Y. Chiu & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), Multiple competencies and self-regulated learning: Implications for multicultural education (pp.215-244). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Holcomb, R. (2007). Observations and comparative analysis of English language instruction in Mexican and Taiwanese universities and implications to English language instruction in the US Rio Hondo college. Retrieved from http://faculty.riohondo.edu/commlang/esl/Sabbatical_Report.pdf
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. San Francisco: The Alemany Press.
Li, M. (2003). Culture and classroom communication: A case study of Asian students in New Zealand language schools. Paper presented at the joint NZARE-AARE Conference 29 November- 3 December 2003.
Liu, M., Zhang, W., & Lu, Z. (2011). Reticence and anxiety in Chinese university ESP poetry class: A case study. Journal of Language and Culture, 2(2), 20-33.
Liu, N. F., & Littlewood, W. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25(3), 371-384.
McGonigal, K. (2005). Using class discussion to meet your teaching goals speaking of teaching. Newsletter, 15(1). Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/dept/CTL/News letter/discussion_leading.pdf
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently...and why. New York. Free Press
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653-684.
Oakland, T., & Lu, L. (2006). Temperament styles of children from the People’s Republic of China and the United States. School Psychology International, 27(2), 192-208.
Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. AMC, 10, 12
Reich, (2003). The socratic method: What is it and how to use it in the classroom. Stanford University Center for Teaching and Learning’s Lecture. Retrieved from https://teachingcommons.stanford.edu/events/socratic-method-what-it-and-how-use-it-classroom
Wei, J. (2014). A study via interviews of the Chinese Bouyei college learners’ EFL classroom anxiety arousals. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 419-428.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Guy Matthews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Remind
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net，or ccc@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
