Possibilities for Intercultural Cooperation Development in Cultural Centres
Abstract
Intercultural cooperation is carried out within a country and between countries. The level of cooperation is strongly macro, meso and micro, depending on nature and capacity of the organisation. Intercultural cooperation is performed by various cultural and educational institutions.
Cultural centre is one of very few cultural organisations, having few analogues in other countries, cherishing, preserving and supporting ethnical culture and forming state image through intercultural cooperation. Thus, intercultural cooperation and communication in the activities of various cultural centres on the macro, meso and micro levels are a scientific issue examined in the article. The quantitative research, conducted in 8 cultural centres operating in the border areas of Lithuania, Belarus and the Kaliningrad Region (Russia), i.e. Kybartai, Pagėgiai, Švencionys, Lazdijai, Pelesa, Rimdžiūnai, Sovetskas and Gusev, helped to determine the intercultural levels of these cultural centres and their communities. Estimating different circumstances of the activity of Lithuanian cultural centres and cultural organisations operating in the Kaliningrad and Belarus border areas (Lithuanian cultural centres / Lithuanian communities), a comparative analysis revealed the key features of cooperation between the community and cultural centres / Lithuanian organisations. The study also analysed the patterns of intercultural cooperation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Argyle, M. (1991). Psychologia stosunków międzyludzkich. PWN, Warszawa.
Armanavičiūtė, V. (1995). Vertybės kaip gyvenimo prasmės pamatas /Acta pedagogica Vilnensia, T.15
Becktord, J. (2002). Stakeholder participation // Part tour: Methods, tolls and techniques: Chapter 29: Quality (Routledge) (pp.288-302). Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/
Finlay, I. (1998). Stakeholders, consensus, participation and democracy. In I. Finlay, S. Niven, S. Young (Eds.), Changing Vocational Education and Training: an international comparative perspective (pp.3-18). London, Routledge.
Houman, A., S., et al. (2011). Intercultural communication: A new approach to international relations and global challenges. Retrieved from http://books.google.lt/books?id=zkK0YqB4cfQC&printsec=frontcover&hl=lt#v=snippet&q=intercultural%20communication%20defin*&f=false
Kardelis, K. (2005). Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija ir metodai. Šiauliai: Liucilijus
Leliūgienė, I., & Sadauskas, J. (2011). Bendruomenės sampratos traktuotės ir tipologija. Socialinių Mokslų Studijos, 3(4), 1281–1297.
Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Lithuania. (XXXX). Retrieved from http://www.lrkm.lt/go.php/eng/IMG
Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas. (2004). Lietuvos Respublikos Kultūros centrų įstatymas 2004 m. liepos 15 d. Nr. IX-2395. - Valstybės žinios: Nr. 120-4435.
Taylor, A. (2009). Mapping the field of VET partnerships// Vocations and learning (pp. 127-151).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Virginija Jureniene
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Remind
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net,or ccc@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture