A Comparison of Measurements of Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing: Large-Grained Indices and Fine-Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices

Qian HUANG

Abstract


As an important measure of second language (L2) writing, syntactic complexity has always been a significant concept in L2 writing research and pedagogy. Syntactic complexity has traditionally been manipulated through large-grained indices. Although large-grained indices are regarded as the most consistent measurement in L2 writing studies, its widespread application has been criticized recently mainly because of the difficulty in its interpretation and a potentially misaligned focus on clausal complexity like clausal subordination. In this article, the researcher aims to adopt the large-grained indices of syntactic complexity, fine-grained indices of clausal complexity, and fine-grained indices of phrasal complexity to predict the holistic quality of independent expository essays written by Chinese college students. Results revealed that fine-grained indices of phrasal complexity were better indices to predict the overall writing quality than either large-grained or fine-grained clausal indices. These results tally with Kyle and Crossley’s (2018) claims with regard to the validity of syntactic complexity indices in predicting writing quality and also provide stronger support for the superiority of fine-grained indices of phrasal complexity.


Keywords


Syntactic complexity; L2 writing; Large-grained indices; Fine-grained indices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bao, G. (2009). Syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ essays: A multidimensional perspective. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 41(4), 291-297.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). A second look at T-unit analysis: Reconsidering the sentence. TESOL quarterly, 26(2), 390-395.

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?. Tesol Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35.

Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2018). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147-164.

Chen Guiyuan. (2010). A study of the writing performance measures and their attributes. Modern Foreign Languages, 33(1), 72-81.

De Clercq, B., & Housen, A. (2017). A cross‐linguistic perspective on syntactic complexity in L2 development: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 315-334.

Gao Xia. (2021). Syntactic complexity in English writing by Chinese EFL learners at different levels. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 53(2), 224-237.

Gray, B., Geluso, J., & Nguyen, P. (2019). The longitudinal development of grammatical complexity at the phrasal and clausal levels in spoken and written responses to the TOEFL iBT® test. ETS Research Report Series, 2019(1), 1-51.

Hwang, H., Jung, H., & Kim, H. (2020). Effects of written versus spoken production modalities on syntactic complexity measures in beginning‐level child EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 267-283.

Jiang, X. Q., Cai, J., & Tang, J. L. (2011). Impacts of an automated essay scoring tool on the development of writing proficiency of Chinese college EFL learners. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 32(6), 36-43.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2019b). Syntactic complexity across proficiency and languages: L2 and L1 writing in Dutch, Italian and Spanish. International journal of applied linguistics, 29(2), 192-210.

Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., Housen, A., & De Clercq, B. (2019a). Variation in syntactic complexity: Introduction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 161-170.

Kyle, K. (2016). Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication. Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 2016.

Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine‐grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333-349.

Lei, L. (2017). Syntactic complexity in the academic writings by Chinese EFL learners. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 40(5),1-10.

Li, M. X., & Liu, Y. B. (2016). A corpus-base study on the syntactic complexity of English writing by Chinese middle school English learners. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 279, 140-145.

Liu, L. G., & Liao, H. T. (2018). Language complexity theories and measurement. Foreign Language Research, 34(1), 52-55.

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496.

Lu, X. (2011). A corpus‐based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college‐level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36-62.

Lu, X. F., & Xu, Q. (2016). L2 syntactic complexity analyzer and its applications in L2 writing research. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 48(3), 409-420.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578.

Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492-518.

Polio, C., & Yoon, H. J. (2018). The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 165-188.

Schaub, S. The longitudinal development of clausal and noun-phrasal complexity in German intermediate learners of English. Learner Corpus Research 2019 Warsaw, 12–14 September, 76.

Ströbel, M., Kerz, E., & Wiechmann, D. (2020). The relationship between first and second language writing: Investigating the effects of first language complexity on second language complexity in advanced stages of learning. Language Learning, 70(3), 732-767.

Taguchi, N., Crawford, W., & Wetzel, D. Z. (2013). What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. Tesol Quarterly, 47(2), 420-430.

Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2020). Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 87-125.

Xu, H. C. (2013). Learning statistics from examples of second language research. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Xu, X. Y., Wang, W. N., & Xiong, Y. Y., et al. (2013). A study on the syntactic complexity of English essays written by Chinese students of English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 45(2), 264-275.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12889

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Remind

We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net,or  ccc@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture