A Comparative Analysis of Science and Arts Students’ Performance in CET Band 4 and Its Pedagogical Implications

Yuling JI, Junying KANG

Abstract


The present research, taking Science and Arts students from respectively three typical Science and Arts schools of Shanxi Normal University as an example, is intended to make a contrastive examination of Science and Arts students’ CET Band 4 performance and attempt to find out how the two groups of students differ from each other in their respective performance in the three parts of the test including listening, reading and writing, and finally discuss the possible reasons. It is revealed that Arts students’ overall performance in the parts of listening, writing is better than that of Science students, meanwhile Science students manifest better reading performance than Arts students. Due to the differences in majors and expertise, Science and Arts students manifest much difference in such aspects as background knowledge, thinking patterns and learning strategy preference, etc. which may lead to their differences in CET Band 4 scores. Considering the differences between Science and Arts students in their learning styles, thinking patterns and learning strategy preference, etc., we propose some suggestions with the intention to help both Arts and Science students to overcome their respective weaknesses so as to improve their comprehensive language competence.

Keywords


Science and Arts students; CET Band 4 performance; Learning strategies; Pedagogical implications

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of EFL students. In Wenden & Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,

Cohen, A. D. (2000). Strategies in learning and using a second language．Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jiang, Z. K. (1994). Learning strategies and their relationship to learning achievement in listening comprehension. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 51-58+80.

Li, H. Y. (2013). The differences of learning strategies of students in high achievers and low achievers. Higher Education, 7, 149-151

Ma, G. H. (1997). A study of the differences between top and low learners’ learning strategies. Foreign Langauges, 2, 38-40．

O’Malley J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (2001). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Oxford R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley Mass: Newbury House.

Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247.

Qiu, S. J. (2009). A comparative study of arts and science students’ vocabulary learning strategies. Journal of Xinxiang Education College, 92-94.

Qiu, S. J. (2011). A study on English vocabulary memory strategy training of college students in humanities and sciences. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 14(1), 87-91

Reliy, P.’ Bats & Balls’. (1996). Beliefs about Talk and Beliefs about Language Learning. Babgkok, 11,151-168.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.

Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language learning. London: Oxford University Press.

Wang, L. M. (2008). A study of high and low group of learners’ learnig strategies and its implications for SBI. Foreign Language Education, (4), 51-54.

Wen, Q. F. (1995). Differences between successful and unsuccessful English learners’ learning methods [J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3, 61-66.

Yang, N. D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27, 515-535.

Yu, Y. (2009). Investigation on non-English majors’ perceptual learning style. Journal of Language. Foreign Language Teaching, 7, 133-134.

Zhang, S. Y. (2013). A study of English vocabulary learning strategies and methods---A case study of Science students of Wenzhou University. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 8, 138-141




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12361

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jun-ying Kang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture