An Adaptation-based Approach to Hedges in the Courtroom Cross-Examination: A Case Study of the Jodi Arias Trial

Yunqian Li

Abstract


Hedges as a considerable fascinated language phenomena and pragmatic strategy, objectively and widely existed in every aspect of human life. Most researches on hedges focus on their communicative function in daily conversation and ESP discourse, but few of them pay attention to the study of hedges used in institutionalized settings. Therefore, this paper aims to study hedges in courtroom discourse in the light of Verschueren’s theory of adaptation, exploring how the different kinds of hedges adapts to the specified linguistic contexts. The analysis shows that the use of hedges in courtroom discourse adapt the physical world, the social world and the mental world by conveying uncertain and objective information, which can effectively create beneficial evidence for the defendant and at the same time deny the damaging accusation of the prosecutor. This paper not only enriches the research results of hedges from the perspective of adaptation theory but also proves again that adaptation theory applies to the study of the use of hedges.


Keywords


Hedges; Adaptation; Physical world; Social world; Mental world

Full Text:

PDF

References


Duan, X., & Ren, S. (2013). The adaptative studies on teacher’s roles in bilingual classroom teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2010.

Gong, G. (2008). A study on pragmatic vagueness as a strategy in Chinese courtroom discourse: An adaptation-based theory [Master’s thesis]. Guangdong Univerisity of Foreign Studies.

Han, D. (2011). Utterance production and interpretation: A discourse-pragmatic study on pragmatic markers in English public speeches. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2776-2794.

Jucker, A. H., Smith, S. W., & Lüdge, T. (2003). Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1737-1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00188-1

Lian, Y. (2018). A study of pragmatic functions of fuzziness in news reports from the perspective of adaptation theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(2), 232-237.

Liu, L. (2009). Presupposition in courtroom questioning: An Adaptation-Relevance Model [Master’s thesis]. Southwest university.

Troby, A. C. (2016). Revision and re-writing as adaptation: Using adaptation theory to encourage student recognition of rhetorical situations [Master’s thesis]. University of Arkansas.

Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Arnold.

Xu, Z., & Li, B. (2006). A study on the adaptability of excessive information in court reply. Foreign Languages Research, 02, 14-18.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11972

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Yunqian Li

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada. 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture