Reciprocal Effect Between Fossilization of the Lexi Cogrammatical Error and Linguistic Focus Within Professional EFL Learners

Gholam-Reza Parvizi

Abstract


Fossilization has become the focus of many L2 studies since its introduction in 1972 as many learners fail to achieve native-speaker competence. Researchers have tried to unravel the causes of fossilization, among which focusing has been claimed to be of great importance. This study aimed to explore the effect of focusing on fossilization. To achieve this aim, a mixed-methods approach was utilized. Sixty advanced L1 Persian learners of English studying in Iran were chosen to perform two written and three spoken tasks twice. Qualitative data included the content analysis of the participants’ performance on the written and spoken tasks while the quantitative data included percentages of focused errors and recurrent erroneous forms. The errors observed in both performances were counted and classified. Three main categories named Grammatical Errors, Lexical Errors, and Cohesive Errors were identified. The observed errors were further classified into 36 subcategories. When learners’ ability in focusing their errors was investigated, it was found that they could focus 37.4% of the 3,796 fossilized forms they had produced. Most of the errors observed were categorized in the category of grammatical errors. Focusing affected the number of errors produced. It can be concluded that becoming aware of ones fossilized forms, one will produce fewer fossilized forms. The results of the current study have implications for English language teachers and learners. By being informed of the errors learners make while learning a language and how their focusing affects fossilization, teachers can improve their teaching practice which in turn enhances learning.

Keywords


Grammatical errors; Lexical errors; Cohesive errors; Fossilization; Noticing.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bolitho, R., Carter, R., Hughes, R., Ivanic, R., Masuhara, H., & Tomlinson, B. (2003). Ten questions about language awareness. ELT Journal, 57(3), 251-259.

Burt, K. M., & Kiparsky, C. (1972). The Gooficon: A repair manual for English. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.

Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.256-310). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Education.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fauziati, E. (2011). Interlanguage and error fossilization: A study of Indonesian students learning English as a foreign language. Conaplin Journal - Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 23-38.

Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-10.

Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error-feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184.

Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243-268.

Han, Z. H. (2003). Fossilization: From simplicity to complexity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(2), 95-128.

Han, Z. H. (2004). Fossilization: Five central issues. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 212-242.

Han, Z. H. (2005). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Han, Z. H. (2009). Interlanguage and fossilization: Towards an analytic model. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Contemporary applied linguistics, Vol. I: Language teaching and learning (pp.137-162). London: Continuum.

Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 459-479.

Harrison, M. (2008). FCE practice tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing, and acquisition of second language knowledge. Special issue of Second Language Research: Issues in SLA and Language Processing, 18(3), 193-223.

Hyltenstam, K. (1988) Lexical characteristics of near-native second language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9(1), 67-84.

Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language Learning, 60(4), 877-925.

Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition: A case study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694-716.

Lewis, M. (2000) language in the lexical approach. In M. Lewis (Ed.), teaching collocation: Further developments in the Lexical Approach (pp.126-154). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of error feedback in second language writing. Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 15, 65-79.

Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487-536). Oxford: Blackwell.

Marefat, F., & Nushi, M. (2012). Combating fossilization through feedback: Does it work? Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 15(1), 43-71.

Mennim, P. (2007). Long-term effects of focusingon oral output. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 265–280.

Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.

Nozadze, A. (2012). Dealing with fossilized errors while teaching grammar. Journal of Education, 1(1), 41-46.

Preston, D. (1989). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schachter, J. (1996). Maturation and the issue of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.159-93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, T. Suthiwan, & I. Walker, Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010 (pp.721-737). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.

Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10(3), 209-231.

Selinker, L., & Lamendella, J. T. (1978). Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3(2), 143-191.

Sharwood-Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. London: Longman.

Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. USA: Routledge.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. A&C Black.

Trillo, J. R. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 769-784.

Truscott, T. (1998). Focusingin second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14(2), 103-135.

Wei, X. (2008). Implication of IL fossilization in second language acquisition. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 127-131.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10247

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Gholam Reza Parvizi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 9375 Rue de Roissy Brossard, Québec, J4X 3A1, Canada 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture