A Method of Quantitative Evaluation of Diagenetic Reservoir Facies of Tight Gas Reservoirs With Logging Multi-Parameters: A Case Study in Sulige Area, Northern Ordos Basin, China
Abstract
Reservoir and flow characteristics of low, ultra-low permeability tight sandstone reservoir were largely controlled by diagenesis in reservoir assessment. In previous studies, diagenesis were researched only by using core analysis data, and it was difficult that diagenetic reservoir facies of the interval and the well without core analysis data were evaluated. Therefore, it was easy and quick that diagenetic reservoir facies were characterized with logging response characteristics which were extracted effectively. Taking tight gas reservoirs for example in Sulige area, northern Ordos Basin, China, logging response characteristics of different classification were analyzed by multiple samples with core analysis data, and the quantitative evaluation index of diagenetic reservoir facies based on logging multi-parameter was set up. A method of quantitative evaluation of diagenetic reservoir facies of tight gas reservoirs with logging multi-parameters was formed in the method of integration of analysis technology of Grey theory, and the accuracy and availability of the method were evaluated. The results shown that non-digitalized problems of diagenetic reservoir facies evaluation was solved by the digitalization method of logging multi-parameters, and the rate of accuracy, of returned classification using methods of mutual test, reached to 91.2%. The results provided a new and effective evaluation approach of low, ultra-low permeability tight sandstone reservoir.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Jing, C., Pu, C. S., & Zhou, Y. (2014). Quantitatively evaluating relatively beneficial reservoir of tight gas reservoirs based on diagenetic reservoir facies log response feature. Natural Gas Geoscience, (5), 657-664.
[2] Zou, C. N., & Tao, S. Z. (2008). Genesis, classification and evaluation method of diagenetic facies. Petroleum Exploration and Development, (5), 526-540.
[3] Wang, R. F., & Chen, M. Q. (2007). Quantitative analysis of porosity evolution during the reservoir sedimentation-diagenesis. Acta Geological Sinica, (10), 1432-1438.
[4] Song, Z. Q., Wang, R. F., & Sun, Y. (2011). Based on the quantitative classification mode of diagenetic reservoir facies to filter relatively excellent quality. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, (1), 88-96.
[5] Wu, X. C., Tang, J., & Ren, L. Y. (2012). Diagenetic facies and high-quality reservoir study of Shanxi-2 member in Jing bian gas filed, Ordos basin. Narural Gas Geoscience, (6), 1004-1010.
[6] Song, Z. Q., Wang, J., & Lu, X. W. (2006). An quantitative assessment method of the diagenetic reservoir facies in extra-low permeability oil-gas reservoir. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, (2), 21-23.
[7] Chu, M. J., Guo. Z. Q., & Qi, Y. L. (2013). Quantitative diagenesis and diagenetic facies analysis on Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang formation in Ordos basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, (3), 477-484.
[8] Yang, H., Fu, J. H., & Wei, X. S. (2005). Characteristics of natural gas reservoir formation in E’erduosi Basin. Natural Gas Industry, (4), 5-8.
[9] Luo, J. L., Liu, X. H., & Lin, T. (2006). Impact of diagenesis and hydrocarbon emplacement on sandstone reservoir quality of the Yanchang formation (Upper Triassic) in the Ordos basin. Acta Geological Sinica, (5), 664-673.
[10] Cheng, Z. G., Song, Z. Q., & Jing, C. (2012). Classfication and characteristics of reservoir diagenetic facies for tight gas reservoir in eastern area of Sulige. Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field, (5), 577-582.
[11] Song, Z. Q., Lei, Q. H., & Liu, D. F. (1997). A study on quantitative reservoir evaluation norms and weight coefficient. Logging Technology, (5), 351-355.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/7285
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to aped@cscanada.net,or aped@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; aped@cscanada.net; aped@cscanada.org
Articles published in Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
ADVANCES IN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Editorial Office
Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures