An Overview of Methods to Mitigate Condensate Banking in Retrograde Gas Reservoirs

Mahmood Amani, Nguyen T. Nguyen

Abstract


Condensate blockage is one of the major problems that have been addressed in the industry for many decades. When the reservoir fluid pressure drops below the dew point pressure during the production process, the liquid drops out of the gas phase and forms condensate in the formation. There are two scenarios that can result in a pressure drop. The first one is the pressure drop due to the flow of the reservoir fluid. The reservoir fluid flows from a high pressure of the reservoir to a lower pressure of the separators at the surface. The second scenario is the drop in reservoir pressure due to pressure depletion. During the production of gas and condensate, the reservoir pressure will decrease with time and when it drops below the dew point pressure, condensate forms everywhere inside the reservoir.

The condensate dramatically reduces the gas permeability. Hence, it decreases the gas productivity. Several methods have been suggested to solve this problem such as gas injection, CO2 Huff-n-Puff, wettability alteration, interfacial tension reduction, hydraulic fracturing, and nonconventional wells. Some of these methods have been implemented in the field and showed positive results, but each method has its own advantages and disadvantages that need to be studied further in order to improve its efficiency. This paper will give a general review of all these methods and their effectiveness in mitigating condensate banking. The decision of using a proper treatment of condensate banking can then be made based on different scenarios that are described in this paper.

Key words: Mitigate condensate banking; Retrograde gas reservoirs; CO2 Huff-n-Puff


Keywords


Mitigate condensate banking; Retrograde gas reservoirs; CO<sub>2</sub> Huff-n-Puff

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Hosein, R., Dawe, R. A., & Amani, M. (2011). Peng-Robinson equation of state predictions for gas condensate before and after lumping. Journal of Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2(2), 41-46.

[2] Moradi, B., Malekzadeh, E., Amani, M., Boukadi, F., & Kharrat, R. (2010, June). Bubble point pressure empirical correlation. Paper presented at Trinidad and Tobago Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.

[3] Engineer, R. (1985, March). Cal Canal field, California: Case history of a tight and abnormally pressured gas condensate reservoir. Paper presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, CA.

[4] Afidick, D., Kaczorowski, N. J., & Bette, S. (1994, November). Production performance of retrograde gas reservoir: A case study of the Arun field. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Melbourne, Australia.

[5] Pathak, P., Fidra, Y., Avida H., Kahaer, Z., Agnew, M., & Hidayat, D. (2004, March). The Arun gas field in Indonesia: Resource management of a mature field. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

[6] Al-Yami, A. M., Gomez, F. A., Al Hamed, K. I., & Al-Buali, M. H. (2013, May). A successful field application of a new chemical treatment in a fluid blocked well in Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the SPE Saudi Arabia section Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.

[7] Fan, L., Harris, B. W., Jamaluddin, A., Kamath, J., Mott, R., Pope, G. A., … Whitson, C. H. (2005). Understanding gas-condensate reservoirs. Oilfield Review, 17(4), 14-27.

[8] Abel, W., Jackson, R. F., & Wattenbarger, R. A. (1970). Simulation of a partial pressure maintenance gas cycling project with a compositional model, Carson Creek Field, Alberta. JPT, 22(1), 38-46.

[9] Farzad, I., & Amani, M. (2012). An analysis of reservoir production strategies in miscible and immiscible gas injection projects. Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development, 3(1), 1-15.

[10] Rostami, R., Amani, M., & Alipour, M. (2012, November). Feasibility study of miscible gas injection in a carbonate oil reservoir: A systematic experimental and simulation approach. Paper presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition (ADIPEC), Abu Dhabi, UAE.

[11] Amini, Sh., Aminshahidy, B., & Afshar, M. (2011). Simulation study of enhanced condensate recovery in a gas-condensate reservoir. Iranian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 8(1), 3-14.

[12] Siregar, S., Hagoort, J., & Ronde, H. (1992, March). Nitrogen Injection vs. Gas Cycling in Rich Retrograde Condensate-Gas Reservoirs. Paper presented at the International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, China.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/7023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)




Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.

We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; aped@cscanada.net; aped@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY)

ADVANCES IN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Editorial Office

Address:1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:office@cscanada.net;  office@cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures